Literature DB >> 32923846

Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Mei-Yin C Polley1, Ying Kuen Cheung2.   

Abstract

Applications in early-phase cancer trials have motivated the development of many statistical designs since the late 1980s, including dose-finding methods, futility screening, treatment selection, and early stopping rules. These methods are often proposed to address the conventional cytotoxic therapeutics for neoplastic diseases and cancer. Recent advances in precision medicine have motivated novel trial designs, most notably the idea of master protocol (eg, platform trial, basket trial, umbrella trial, N-of-1 trial), for the evaluation of molecularly targeted cancer therapies. In this article, we review the concepts and methodology of early-phase cancer trial designs with a focus on dose finding and treatment screening and put these methods in the context of platform trials of molecularly targeted cancer therapies. Because most cancer trial designs have been developed for cytotoxic agents, we will discuss how these time-tested design principles hold relevance for targeted cancer therapies, and we will delineate how a master protocol may serve as an efficient platform for safety and efficacy evaluations of novel targeted therapies.
© 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32923846      PMCID: PMC7446322          DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol        ISSN: 2473-4284


  60 in total

1.  Statistical properties of the traditional algorithm-based designs for phase I cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Y Lin; W J Shih
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  William F Rosenberger; Linda M Haines
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Critical Review of Umbrella, Basket, and Platform Designs for Oncology Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Optimal two-stage designs for clinical trials with binary response.

Authors:  P F Thall; R Simon; S S Ellenberg; R Shrager
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  The Master Protocol Concept.

Authors:  Mary W Redman; Carmen J Allegra
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Randomized phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon; R E Wittes; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-12

8.  Phase I trial of oral mTOR inhibitor everolimus in combination with trastuzumab and vinorelbine in pre-treated patients with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Guy Jerusalem; Angelica Fasolo; Veronique Dieras; Fatima Cardoso; Jonas Bergh; Luc Vittori; Yufen Zhang; Cristian Massacesi; Tarek Sahmoud; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  ALCHEMIST: Bringing genomic discovery and targeted therapies to early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  D E Gerber; G R Oxnard; R Govindan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Utility-based optimization of combination therapy using ordinal toxicity and efficacy in phase I/II trials.

Authors:  Nadine Houede; Peter F Thall; Hoang Nguyen; Xavier Paoletti; Andrew Kramar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Guidelines for clinical evaluation of anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  Hironobu Minami; Naomi Kiyota; Shiro Kimbara; Yuichi Ando; Tomoya Shimokata; Atsushi Ohtsu; Nozomu Fuse; Yasutoshi Kuboki; Toshio Shimizu; Noboru Yamamoto; Kazuto Nishio; Yutaka Kawakami; Shin-Ichi Nihira; Kazuhiro Sase; Takahiro Nonaka; Hideaki Takahashi; Yukiko Komori; Koshin Kiyohara
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 2.  Adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation for intact localized prostate cancer how to optimally test a rapidly emerging technology.

Authors:  William A Hall; Amar U Kishan; Emma Hall; Himanshu Nagar; Danny Vesprini; Eric Paulson; Uulke A Van der Heide; Colleen A F Lawton; Linda G W Kerkmeijer; Alison C Tree
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.