Literature DB >> 21573910

Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream.

Mark S Greeley1, Lynn A Kszos, Gail W Morris, John G Smith, Arthur J Stewart.   

Abstract

National Pollution Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES)-driven effluent toxicity tests using Ceriodaphnia dubia and fathead minnows were conducted for more than 20 years to assess and monitor the effects of wastewaters at the United States (U.S.) Department of Energy Y-12 National Security Complex (Y-12 Complex) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Toxicity testing was also conducted on water samples from East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC), the wastewater receiving stream, as part of a comprehensive biological monitoring and assessment program. In this paper, we evaluate the roles of this long-term toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of EFPC. Effluent toxicity testing, associated toxicant evaluation studies, and ambient toxicity monitoring were instrumental in identifying toxicant sources at the Y-12 Complex, guiding modifications to wastewater treatment procedures, and assessing the success of various pollution-abatement actions. The elimination of untreated wastewater discharges, the dechlorination of remaining wastewater streams, and the implementation of flow management at the stream headwaters were the primary actions associated with significant reductions in the toxicity of stream water in the upper reaches of EFPC from the late 1980s through mid 1990s. Through time, as regulatory requirements changed and water quality improved, emphasis shifted from comprehensive toxicity assessments to more focused toxicity monitoring efforts. Ambient toxicity testing with C. dubia and fathead minnows was supplemented with less-standardized but more sensitive alternative laboratory toxicity tests and in situ bioassays. The Y-12 Complex biological monitoring experience demonstrates the value of toxicity studies to the management of a wastewater receiving stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21573910     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9679-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  12 in total

1.  Ambient bioassays for assessing water-quality conditions in receiving streams.

Authors:  A J Stewart
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  The role of periphyton in mediating the effects of pollution in a stream ecosystem.

Authors:  Walter R Hill; Michael G Ryon; John G Smith; S Marshall Adams; Harry L Boston; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.

Authors:  Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith; James M Loar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Twenty-five years of ecological recovery of East Fork Poplar Creek: review of environmental problems and remedial actions.

Authors:  James M Loar; Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Application of biochemical and physiological indicators for assessing recovery of fish populations in a disturbed stream.

Authors:  S Marshall Adams; Kenneth D Ham
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; W Kelly Roy; Teresa J Mathews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Toxicity of lithium to three freshwater organisms and the antagonistic effect of sodium.

Authors:  Lynn Adams Kszos; John J Beauchamp; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 10.  Review of lithium in the aquatic environment: distribution in the United States, toxicity and case example of groundwater contamination.

Authors:  Lynn Adams Kszos; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  6 in total

1.  Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program.

Authors:  Sigurd W Christensen; Craig C Brandt; Mary K McCracken
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Long-term biological monitoring of an impaired stream: synthesis and environmental management implications.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson; Rebecca A Efroymson; S Marshall Adams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.

Authors:  Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith; James M Loar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; W Kelly Roy; Teresa J Mathews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.