Literature DB >> 21380789

Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.

Arthur J Stewart1, John G Smith, James M Loar.   

Abstract

We review long-term changes that have occurred in factors affecting water quality in East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC; in East Tennessee) over a nearly 25-year monitoring period. Historically, the stream has received wastewaters and pollutants from a major United States Department of Energy (DOE) facility on the headwaters of the stream. Early in the monitoring program, EFPC was perturbed chemically, especially within its headwaters; evidence of this perturbation extended downstream for many kilometers. The magnitude of this perturbation, and the concentrations of many biologically significant water-quality factors, has lessened substantially through time. The changes in water-quality factors resulted from a large number of operational changes and remedial actions implemented at the DOE facility. Chief among these were consolidation and elimination of many effluents, elimination of an unlined settling/flow equalization basin, reduction in amount of blow-down from cooling tower operations, dechlorination of effluents, and implementation of flow augmentation. Although many water-quality characteristics in upper EFPC have become more similar to those of reference streams, conditions remain far from pristine. Nutrient enrichment may be one of the more challenging problems remaining before further biological improvements occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380789     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9630-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  13 in total

1.  Relationships among exceedences of metals criteria, the results of ambient bioassays, and community metrics in mining-impacted streams.

Authors:  Michael B Griffith; James M Lazorchak; Alan T Herlihy
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Recovery of fish communities in a warm water stream following pollution abatement.

Authors:  Michael G Ryon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The role of periphyton in mediating the effects of pollution in a stream ecosystem.

Authors:  Walter R Hill; Michael G Ryon; John G Smith; S Marshall Adams; Harry L Boston; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Mass-transfer limitations for nitrate removal in a uranium-contaminated aquifer.

Authors:  Jian Luo; Olaf A Cirpka; Weimin Wu; Michael N Fienen; Philip M Jardine; Tonia L Mehlhorn; David B Watson; Craig S Criddle; Peter K Kitanidis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Twenty-five years of ecological recovery of East Fork Poplar Creek: review of environmental problems and remedial actions.

Authors:  James M Loar; Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream.

Authors:  Mark S Greeley; Lynn A Kszos; Gail W Morris; John G Smith; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; W Kelly Roy; Teresa J Mathews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Macroinvertebrate production and food web energetics in an industrially contaminated stream.

Authors:  Clay Runck
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.657

10.  Source of toxicity in storm water: zinc from commonly used paint.

Authors:  Lynn Adams Kszos; Gail W Morris; Belinda K Konetsky
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  10 in total

1.  Recovery of fish communities in a warm water stream following pollution abatement.

Authors:  Michael G Ryon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Persistent Hg contamination and occurrence of Hg-methylating transcript (hgcA) downstream of a chlor-alkali plant in the Olt River (Romania).

Authors:  Andrea G Bravo; Jean-Luc Loizeau; Perrine Dranguet; Stamatina Makri; Erik Björn; Viorel Gh Ungureanu; Vera I Slaveykova; Claudia Cosio
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program.

Authors:  Sigurd W Christensen; Craig C Brandt; Mary K McCracken
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Long-term biological monitoring of an impaired stream: synthesis and environmental management implications.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson; Rebecca A Efroymson; S Marshall Adams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Twenty-five years of ecological recovery of East Fork Poplar Creek: review of environmental problems and remedial actions.

Authors:  James M Loar; Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream.

Authors:  Mark S Greeley; Lynn A Kszos; Gail W Morris; John G Smith; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Environmental quality assessment of reservoirs impacted by Hg from chlor-alkali technologies: case study of a recovery.

Authors:  Séverine Le Faucheur; Dan Vasiliu; Irina Catianis; Mariana Zazu; Perrine Dranguet; Rebecca Beauvais-Flück; Jean-Luc Loizeau; Claudia Cosio; Costin Ungureanu; Viorel Gheorghe Ungureanu; Vera I Slaveykova
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; W Kelly Roy; Teresa J Mathews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.