Literature DB >> 21380788

Monitoring fish contaminant responses to abatement actions: factors that affect recovery.

George R Southworth1, Mark J Peterson, W Kelly Roy, Teresa J Mathews.   

Abstract

Monitoring of contaminant accumulation in fish has been conducted in East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) in Oak Ridge, Tennessee since 1985. Bioaccumulation trends are examined over a twenty year period coinciding with major pollution abatement actions by a Department of Energy facility at the stream's headwaters. Although EFPC is enriched in many contaminants relative to other local streams, only polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and mercury (Hg) were found to accumulate in the edible portions of fish to levels of human health concern. Mercury concentrations in redbreast sunfish were found to vary with season of collection, sex and size of individual fish. Over the course of the monitoring, waterborne Hg concentrations were reduced >80%; however, this did not translate into a comparable decrease in Hg bioaccumulation at most sites. Mercury bioaccumulation in fish did respond to decreased inputs in the industrialized headwater reach, but paradoxically increased in the lowermost reach of EFPC. As a result, the downstream pattern of Hg concentration in fish changed from one resembling dilution of a headwater point source in the 1980s to a uniform distribution in the 2000s. The reason for this remains unknown, but is hypothesized to involve changes in the chemical form and reactivity of waterborne Hg associated with the removal of residual chlorine and the addition of suspended particulates to the streamflow. PCB concentrations in fish varied greatly from year-to-year, but always exhibited a pronounced downstream decrease, and appeared to respond to management practices that limited episodic inputs from legacy sources within the facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21380788     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-011-9637-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  14 in total

1.  Whole-ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition.

Authors:  Reed C Harris; John W M Rudd; Marc Amyot; Christopher L Babiarz; Ken G Beaty; Paul J Blanchfield; R A Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Cynthia C Gilmour; Jennifer A Graydon; Andrew Heyes; Holger Hintelmann; James P Hurley; Carol A Kelly; David P Krabbenhoft; Steve E Lindberg; Robert P Mason; Michael J Paterson; Cheryl L Podemski; Art Robinson; Ken A Sandilands; George R Southworth; Vincent L St Louis; Michael T Tate
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of periphyton in mediating the effects of pollution in a stream ecosystem.

Authors:  Walter R Hill; Michael G Ryon; John G Smith; S Marshall Adams; Harry L Boston; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.

Authors:  Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith; James M Loar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Effect of watershed parameters on mercury distribution in different environmental compartments in the Mobile Alabama River Basin, USA.

Authors:  Kimberly A Warner; Jean-Claude J Bonzongo; Eric E Roden; G Milton Ward; Adrian C Green; Indrajeet Chaubey; W Berry Lyons; D Albrey Arrington
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Influences on mercury bioaccumulation factors for the Savannah River.

Authors:  M H Paller; J A Bowers; J W Littrell; A V Guanlao
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Monitoring mercury in fish in a stream system receiving multiple industrial inputs.

Authors:  M J Peterson; G R Southworth; W D Crumby
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 3. Trophic dynamics and methylmercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Lia C Chasar; Barbara C Scudder; A Robin Stewart; Amanda H Bell; George R Aiken
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Effect of point source removal on mercury bioaccumulation in an industrial pond.

Authors:  George R Southworth; Mark J Peterson; Mary A Bogle
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Form of mercury in stream fish exposed to high concentrations of dissolved inorganic mercury.

Authors:  G R Southworth; R R Turner; M J Peterson; M A Bogle
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  10 in total

1.  Recovery of fish communities in a warm water stream following pollution abatement.

Authors:  Michael G Ryon
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program.

Authors:  Sigurd W Christensen; Craig C Brandt; Mary K McCracken
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Long-term biological monitoring of an impaired stream: synthesis and environmental management implications.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson; Rebecca A Efroymson; S Marshall Adams
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Long-term benthic macroinvertebrate community monitoring to assess pollution abatement effectiveness.

Authors:  John G Smith; Craig C Brandt; Sigurd W Christensen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Long-term water-quality changes in East Fork Poplar Creek, Tennessee: background, trends, and potential biological consequences.

Authors:  Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith; James M Loar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Twenty-five years of ecological recovery of East Fork Poplar Creek: review of environmental problems and remedial actions.

Authors:  James M Loar; Arthur J Stewart; John G Smith
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Introduction to the biological monitoring and abatement program.

Authors:  Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Role of a comprehensive toxicity assessment and monitoring program in the management and ecological recovery of a wastewater receiving stream.

Authors:  Mark S Greeley; Lynn A Kszos; Gail W Morris; John G Smith; Arthur J Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Selenium:mercury molar ratios in freshwater fish from Tennessee: individual, species, and geographical variations have implications for management.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Gochfeld; C Jeitner; M Donio; T Pittfield
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 3.184

10.  Publishing Environmental Assessment and Management Science: Crossing the Hurdles.

Authors:  Rebecca A Efroymson; Mark J Peterson
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 8.589

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.