Literature DB >> 21556847

Scanning irradiation device for mice in vivo with pulsed and continuous proton beams.

Christoph Greubel1, Walter Assmann, Christian Burgdorf, Günther Dollinger, Guanghua Du, Volker Hable, Alexander Hapfelmeier, Ralf Hertenberger, Peter Kneschaurek, Dörte Michalski, Michael Molls, Sabine Reinhardt, Barbara Röper, Stefan Schell, Thomas E Schmid, Christian Siebenwirth, Tatiana Wenzl, Olga Zlobinskaya, Jan J Wilkens.   

Abstract

A technical set-up for irradiation of subcutaneous tumours in mice with nanosecond-pulsed proton beams or continuous proton beams is described and was successfully used in a first experiment to explore future potential of laser-driven particle beams, which are pulsed due to the acceleration process, for radiation therapy. The chosen concept uses a microbeam approach. By focusing the beam to approximately 100 × 100 μm(2), the necessary fluence of 10(9) protons per cm(2) to deliver a dose of 20 Gy with one-nanosecond shot in the Bragg peak of 23 MeV protons is achieved. Electrical and mechanical beam scanning combines rapid dose delivery with large scan ranges. Aluminium sheets one millimetre in front of the target are used as beam energy degrader, necessary for adjusting the depth-dose profile. The required procedures for treatment planning and dose verification are presented. In a first experiment, 24 tumours in mice were successfully irradiated with 23 MeV protons and a single dose of 20 Gy in pulsed or continuous mode with dose differences between both modes of 10%. So far, no significant difference in tumour growth delay was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21556847     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0365-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  13 in total

1.  Inverse planning for photon and proton beams.

Authors:  U Oelfke; T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.482

2.  CT calibration for two-dimensional scaling of proton pencil beams.

Authors:  Hanitra Szymanowski; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Design and evaluation of a variable aperture collimator for conformal radiotherapy of small animals using a microCT scanner.

Authors:  Edward E Graves; Hu Zhou; Raja Chatterjee; Paul J Keall; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Christopher H Contag; Arthur L Boyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  No evidence for a different RBE between pulsed and continuous 20 MeV protons.

Authors:  T E Schmid; G Dollinger; A Hauptner; V Hable; C Greubel; S Auer; A A Friedl; M Molls; B Röper
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  An analytical approximation of the Bragg curve for therapeutic proton beams.

Authors:  T Bortfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Relative biological effectiveness of pulsed and continuous 20 MeV protons for micronucleus induction in 3D human reconstructed skin tissue.

Authors:  Thomas E Schmid; Günther Dollinger; Volker Hable; Christoph Greubel; Olga Zlobinskaya; Dörte Michalski; Michael Molls; Barbara Röper
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  In vivo determinations of RBE in a high energy modulated proton beam using normal tissue reactions and fractionated dose schedules.

Authors:  J Tepper; L Verhey; M Goitein; H D Suit
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  High-resolution, small animal radiation research platform with x-ray tomographic guidance capabilities.

Authors:  John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Bath and shower effects in the rat parotid gland explain increased relative risk of parotid gland dysfunction after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Peter van Luijk; Hette Faber; Jacobus M Schippers; Sytze Brandenburg; Johannes A Langendijk; Harm Meertens; Robert P Coppes
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Radiobiologic significance of response of intratumor quiescent cells in vivo to accelerated carbon ion beams compared with gamma-rays and reactor neutron beams.

Authors:  Shin-Ichiro Masunaga; Koichi Ando; Akiko Uzawa; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yoshiya Furusawa; Sachiko Koike; Yoshinori Sakurai; Kenji Nagata; Minoru Suzuki; Genro Kashino; Yuko Kinashi; Hiroki Tanaka; Akira Maruhashi; Koji Ono
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Microirradiation techniques in radiobiological research.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Miguel J Ruiz-Gómez
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  New challenges in radiobiology research with microbeams.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Exploring the feasibility of a clinical proton beam with an adaptive aperture for pre-clinical research.

Authors:  Isabel P Almeida; Ana Vaniqui; Lotte Ejr Schyns; Brent van der Heyden; James Cooley; Townsend Zwart; Armin Langenegger; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison study of in vivo dose response to laser-driven versus conventional electron beam.

Authors:  Melanie Oppelt; Michael Baumann; Ralf Bergmann; Elke Beyreuther; Kerstin Brüchner; Josefin Hartmann; Leonhard Karsch; Mechthild Krause; Lydia Laschinsky; Elisabeth Leßmann; Maria Nicolai; Maria Reuter; Christian Richter; Alexander Sävert; Michael Schnell; Michael Schürer; Julia Woithe; Malte Kaluza; Jörg Pawelke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Comparison of the [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT PET Tracers in the Evaluation of the Preclinical Proton Therapy Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  David Brasse; Hélène Burckel; Patrice Marchand; Marc Rousseau; Ali Ouadi; Marie Vanstalle; Christian Finck; Patrice Laquerriere; Frédéric Boisson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Laser-driven beam lines for delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy with particle beams.

Authors:  Kerstin M Hofmann; Stefan Schell; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Survival of tumor cells after proton irradiation with ultra-high dose rates.

Authors:  Susanne Auer; Volker Hable; Christoph Greubel; Guido A Drexler; Thomas E Schmid; Claus Belka; Günther Dollinger; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Live cell imaging at the Munich ion microbeam SNAKE - a status report.

Authors:  Guido A Drexler; Christian Siebenwirth; Sophie E Drexler; Stefanie Girst; Christoph Greubel; Günther Dollinger; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Proton pencil minibeam irradiation of an in-vivo mouse ear model spares healthy tissue dependent on beam size.

Authors:  Matthias Sammer; Esther Zahnbrecher; Sophie Dobiasch; Stefanie Girst; Christoph Greubel; Katarina Ilicic; Judith Reindl; Benjamin Schwarz; Christian Siebenwirth; Dietrich W M Walsh; Stephanie E Combs; Günther Dollinger; Thomas E Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Kirsten Lauber; Maximilian Niyazi; Anna A Friedl; Minglun Li; Cornelius Maihöfer; Lars Schüttrumpf; Anne Ernst; Olivier M Niemöller; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.