Literature DB >> 33847900

Comparison of the [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT PET Tracers in the Evaluation of the Preclinical Proton Therapy Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

David Brasse1, Hélène Burckel2, Patrice Marchand3, Marc Rousseau3, Ali Ouadi3, Marie Vanstalle3, Christian Finck3, Patrice Laquerriere3, Frédéric Boisson3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main objective of the present study was to compare the 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]-FDG) and 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine ([18F]-FLT) PET imaging biomarkers for the longitudinal follow-up of small animal proton therapy studies in the context of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PROCEDURES: SK-HEP-1 cells were injected into NMRI nude mice to mimic human HCC. The behavior of [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT tumor uptake was evaluated after proton therapy procedures. The proton single-fraction doses were 5, 10, and 20 Gy, with a dose rate of 10 Gy/min. The experimental protocol consisted of 8 groups of 10 mice, each group experiencing a particular dose/radiotracer condition. A reference PET exam was performed on each mouse the day before the irradiation procedure, followed by PET exams every 3 days up to 16 days after irradiation.
RESULTS: [18F]-FDG uptake showed a linear dose-dependent increase in the first days after treatment (37%, p < 0.05), while [18F]-FLT uptake decreased in a dose-dependent manner (e.g., 21% for 5 Gy compared to 10 Gy, p = 1.1e-2). At the later time point, [18F]-FDG normalized activity showed an 85% decrease (p < 0.01) for both 10 and 20 Gy doses and no variation for 5 Gy. Conversely, a significant 61% (p = 0.002) increase was observed for [18F]-FLT normalized activity at 5 Gy and no variation for higher doses.
CONCLUSION: We showed that the use of the [18F]-FDG and [18F]-FLT radiolabeled molecules can provide useful and complementary information for longitudinal follow-up of small animal proton therapy studies in the context of HCC. [18F]-FDG PET imaging enables a treatment monitoring several days/weeks postirradiation. On the other hand, [18F]-FLT could represent a good candidate to monitor the treatment few days postirradiation, in the context of hypo-fractioned and close irradiation planning. This opens new perspectives in terms of treatment efficacy verification depending on the irradiation scheme.
© 2021. World Molecular Imaging Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Longitudinal study; PET; Preclinical studies; Proton therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33847900     DOI: 10.1007/s11307-021-01602-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol        ISSN: 1536-1632            Impact factor:   3.488


  41 in total

Review 1.  Is there a role for proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Dionisi; Lamberto Widesott; Stefano Lorentini; Maurizio Amichetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 2.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Rosanna H Yeung; Tobias R Chapman; Stephen R Bowen; Smith Apisarnthanarax
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 4.  Molecular Imaging-Guided Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does it Fulfill the Promises?

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Daniela Thorwarth; John Aldo Lee
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Role of interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the early prediction of clinical outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) during radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marta Cremonesi; Laura Gilardi; Mahila Esmeralda Ferrari; Gaia Piperno; Laura Lavinia Travaini; Robert Timmerman; Francesca Botta; Guido Baroni; Chiara Maria Grana; Sara Ronchi; Delia Ciardo; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Cristina Garibaldi; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Current Standard and Future Perspectives in Non-Surgical Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tobias Eggert; Tim F Greten
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Image-guided Treatment in the Hepatobiliary System: Role of Imaging in Treatment Planning and Posttreatment Evaluation.

Authors:  Surabhi Bajpai; Avinash Kambadakone; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ronald S Arellano; Debra A Gervais; Dushyant Sahani
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Hepatocellular carcinoma radiation therapy: review of evidence and future opportunities.

Authors:  Jonathan Klein; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Indications and Directions for Future Study.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Laura A Dawson; Sunil Krishnan; Jinsil Seong; Jason C Cheng; Shiv K Sarin; Milan Kinkhabwala; Mansoor M Ahmed; Bhadrasain Vikram; C Norman Coleman; Chandan Guha
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  FDG PET using SUVmax for preoperative T-staging of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yung-Cheng Huang; Hung-I Lu; Shun-Chen Huang; Chien-Chin Hsu; Nan-Tsing Chiu; Yu-Ming Wang; Yi-Chun Chiu; Shau-Hsuan Li
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.