Literature DB >> 21552426

Comparison of the Lunar DPX-L and Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers for assessing total and regional body composition.

Derek M Huffman1, Niamh M Landy, Eva Potter, Tim R Nagy, Barbara A Gower.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the agreement of the Lunar DPX-L with the newer Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) for determining total-body and regional (arms, legs, trunk) bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), fat mass (FM), lean tissue mass (LTM), total body mass (BM) and percent fat. A total of 106 apparently healthy males (n=34) and females (n=72) between the ages of 8-72 years were scanned consecutively on the DPX-L (software version 1.35) and Prodigy DXA (enCORE v. 3.6 software). Paired t-tests indicated significantly higher measures by Prodigy for BM (percent difference= 1.1%) and total-body BMD (2.2%), BMC (2.9%), FM (3.5%), and percent fat (2.8%; P<0.001), but not LTM (-0.2%). Regional estimates of FM and bone tended to be overestimated by Prodigy relative to DPX-L. The percent difference was most pronounced for FM in the arms (14.2%) and trunk (8.5%), BMD in the legs (4.9%), LTM in arms (5.6%), and BMC in the trunk (5.9%); but all total-body and regional measures were strongly and significantly correlated (P<0.001). The method of Bland and Altman indicated that the Prodigy overestimated DPX-L for BM (r=0.343; P<0.001), and total-body measures of BMD (r=0.460; P<0.001), and BMC (r=0.321; P<0.001) at higher values, as indicated by the significant, positive association between difference (Prodigy-DPX-L) versus mean ((Prodigy+DPX-L)/2). Regionally, Prodigy overestimated DPX-L for BMD in the legs, BMC in the legs and trunk, and FM in the arms at higher values (P<0.001). In contrast, FM in the legs was underestimated by Prodigy relative to DPX-L at higher values (P<0.001), and no regional bias was observed for LTM. In conclusion, we recommend that correction equations be used for comparing BM, total-body BMD and BMC, and regionally for BMD in the legs, BMC in the legs and trunk, and FM in the arms and legs. The use of correction equations for other estimates is not required for making direct comparisons.

Year:  2005        PMID: 21552426      PMCID: PMC3088092     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res        ISSN: 1479-456X


  12 in total

1.  Soft tissue composition of pigs measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry: comparison with chemical analyses and effects of carcass thicknesses.

Authors:  H C Lukaski; M J Marchello; C B Hall; D M Schafer; W A Siders
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 2.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition: differences between devices and comparison with reference methods.

Authors:  Laurence Genton; Didier Hans; Ursula G Kyle; Claude Pichard
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.008

3.  Body composition results by DXA differ with manufacturer, instrument generation and software version.

Authors:  C N Kistorp; O L Svendsen
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.

Authors:  M D Van Loan; N L Keim; K Berg; P L Mayclin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers.

Authors:  P Eiken; O Bärenholdt; L Bjørn Jensen; J Gram; S Pors Nielsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Comparisons between Hologic, Norland and Lunar dual-energy X-ray bone absorptiometers.

Authors:  P Tothill; D M Reid; A Avenell; J A Fenner
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1993

8.  Precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of mice.

Authors:  T R Nagy; A L Clair
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2000-08

9.  Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. II: Studies in vivo.

Authors:  P Eiken; N Kolthoff; O Bärenholdt; F Hermansen; S Pors Nielsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Cross-calibration of fat and lean measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to pig carcass analysis in the pediatric body weight range.

Authors:  S J Pintauro; T R Nagy; C M Duthie; M I Goran
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  9 in total

1.  Ability of the Harris Benedict formula to predict energy requirements differs with weight history and ethnicity.

Authors:  Crystal C Douglas; Jeannine C Lawrence; Nikki C Bush; Robert A Oster; Barbara A Gower; Betty E Darnell
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Dietary calcium intake is associated with less gain in intra-abdominal adipose tissue over 1 year.

Authors:  Nikki C Bush; Jessica A Alvarez; Suzanne S Choquette; Gary R Hunter; Robert A Oster; Betty E Darnell; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Shorter sleep may be a risk factor for impaired bone mass accrual in childhood.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Lynae J Hanks; Jose R Fernandez
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Body composition changes by DXA, BIA and skinfolds during exercise training in women.

Authors:  Elina Sillanpää; Arja Häkkinen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Adiposity and genetic admixture, but not race/ethnicity, influence bone mineral content in peripubertal children.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Olivia Thomas; Akilah Dulin-Keita; Jose R Fernandez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Vitamin D intake is associated with insulin sensitivity in African American, but not European American, women.

Authors:  Jessica A Alvarez; Nikki C Bush; Suzanne S Choquette; Gary R Hunter; Betty E Darnell; Robert A Oster; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Differential influence of diet and physical activity on components of metabolic syndrome in a multiethnic sample of children.

Authors:  Krista Casazza; Akilah Dulin-Keita; Barbara A Gower; Jose R Fernandez
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-02

8.  Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Young Do Koh; Jun-Il Yoo; Sujin Kim; Guen Young Lee; Sung Bin Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-02-28

9.  Genetic variation in a member of the laminin gene family affects variation in body composition in Drosophila and humans.

Authors:  Maria De Luca; Michelle Moses Chambers; Krista Casazza; Kerry H Lok; Gary R Hunter; Barbara A Gower; José R Fernández
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 2.797

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.