Literature DB >> 7791591

Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.

M D Van Loan1, N L Keim, K Berg, P L Mayclin.   

Abstract

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures body composition, tissue distribution, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences are possible due to software versions. This investigation examined body composition, tissue distribution, BMC, and BMD measurements using a DXA (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) with different software packages (versions 3.4 and 3.6R). Fifteen women, ages 20-40 yr, enrolled in a weight-loss study (body mass index = 28) and volunteered for body composition assessment by densitometry. BMC, BMD, and tissue distribution measurements were made using DXA. Results were analyzed once each with software versions 3.4 and 3.6R. BMC + total soft tissue, measured using DXA, was comparable to measured body weight (3.4 = 76.3 kg; 3.6R = 76.5 kg; weight = 76.5 kg). Lower BMC and BMD (5.5% and 1.8%, P < 0.01) were observed with 3.6R. Arm tissue mass was lower (1,530 g; P < 0.01) and fat declined (1,069 g; P < 0.01) with 3.6R. Leg tissue mass decreased 487 g (P < 0.01), but fat tissue increased (526 g, P < 0.01) with 3.6R. A larger fat mass (1,492 g) and lower lean mass (1,115 g) were observed with 3.6R compared with 3.4. Percent fat values by densitometry using DXA 3.4 and 3.6R were 38.1%, 39.9, and 41.9%, respectively. These results demonstrated differences in total body composition, lean and fat tissue distribution, and bone measurements from DXA software versions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7791591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  7 in total

1.  Bone mineral density and body composition of the United States Olympic women's field hockey team.

Authors:  P B Sparling; T K Snow; L B Rosskopf; E M O'Donnell; P S Freedson; W C Byrnes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Comparison of the Lunar DPX-L and Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers for assessing total and regional body composition.

Authors:  Derek M Huffman; Niamh M Landy; Eva Potter; Tim R Nagy; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2005-01-01

3.  Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and iDXA Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometers for Assessing Total and Regional Body Composition.

Authors:  Shannon A Morrison; Robert M Petri; Heather L Hunter; Dheeraj Raju; Barbara Gower
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Validation of fan beam dual energy x ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in adults aged 18-45 years.

Authors:  J Norcross; M D Van Loan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Pediatric body composition analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Maura Helba; Larry A Binkovitz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-05-05

6.  Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of abdominal fat by comparison with magnetic resonance imaging in an Indian population.

Authors:  Amy E Taylor; Hannah Kuper; Ravi D Varma; Jonathan C Wells; Jimmy D Bell; K V Radhakrishna; Bharati Kulkarni; Sanjay Kinra; Nicholas J Timpson; Shah Ebrahim; George Davey Smith; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds.

Authors:  Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal; Mario Albaladejo-Saura; Ana E Luna-Badachi; Francisco Esparza-Ros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.