Literature DB >> 7873295

Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. I: Studies in vitro at four centers.

P Eiken1, O Bärenholdt, L Bjørn Jensen, J Gram, S Pors Nielsen.   

Abstract

The performance of the Hologic QDR-2000 DXA osteodensitometer was critically evaluated at four centers, using at all four centers one bone equivalent humanoid spine phantom supplied by the manufacturer. Results were compared with results from Hologic QDR-1000/W using that phantom tested at the same centers. It appears that the concept of fan-beam scanning--as used in the QDR-2000: a fan-beam, a linear array detector above the phantom, and an x-ray tube located rather close to the spine below the phantom--creates problems due to the magnification effect of the fan beam. The effect of decreasing the distance between the "vertebrae" of the phantom and the couch are: bone mineral content (BMC) increases by 2.8% per cm, projected area (Area) by 2.8% per cm, and bone mineral density (BMD) is unchanged. When QDR-1000/W is upgraded to QDR-2000, BMD is relatively constant, but there are shifts of BMC and Area which are partly due to the magnification effect of the fan-beam. Replacement of a QDR-1000/W with a QDR-2000 can invalidate longitudinal measurements, even for BMD, unless the proportionality factors of the QDR-2000 are checked and, if necessary, changed. This is true for switching from QDR-1000/W to pencil-beam mode of QDR-2000 or to fan-beam mode of QDR-2000. Even with pencil-beam mode, the long-term precision error with phantoms is higher for QDR-2000 than for QDR-1000/W (for BMD, 0.47% versus 0.35%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7873295     DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90315-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the Lunar DPX-L and Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers for assessing total and regional body composition.

Authors:  Derek M Huffman; Niamh M Landy; Eva Potter; Tim R Nagy; Barbara A Gower
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2005-01-01

2.  Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.

Authors:  G M Blake
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Changes in volumetric bone mineral density and bone quality after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Alba Hernández-Martínez; Lucas Veras; Giorjines Boppre; Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; José Oliveira; Florêncio Diniz-Sousa; Hélder Fonseca
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 10.867

4.  Estimating the absorbed dose to critical organs during dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M Mokhtari-Dizaji; A A Sharafi; B Larijani; N Mokhlesian; H Hasanzadeh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.