Literature DB >> 21547006

Imaging studies for evaluating impact of position sampling techniques in PET scanners.

Suleman Surti1, Matthew E Werner, Joel S Karp.   

Abstract

Previously we have evaluated two crystal calibration techniques that can be applied to pixelated detector designs to improve system spatial resolution without detector motion. The inter-crystal positioning technique utilizes sub-sampling in the crystal flood map to better sample the Compton scatter events in the detector. The Compton scatter rejection technique, on the other hand, rejects those events that are located further from individual crystal centers in the flood map. Here we performed imaging studies with a Mini Deluxe hot rod phantom and a hot sphere phantom (sphere diameters of 4.95 and 7.86-mm with 6:1 uptake relative to background) using the standard crystal calibration technique, as well as the inter-crystal and Compton rejection calibration techniques. Our results show improved separation of 1.6-mm diameter hot rods with the two new crystal calibration techniques that is consistent with improved spatial resolution. For the hot sphere phantom the contrast recovery is improved with both the inter-crystal and Compton rejection calibration techniques over the standard calibration technique. The only drawback of the inter-crystal calibration technique is the increase in the number of possible lines-of-response (LORs) (factor of 16) that may slow image reconstruction. With the Compton rejection calibration technique, loss of counts leads to increased noise in the images.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21547006      PMCID: PMC3085252          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2010.2049121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  9 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

Authors:  A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms.

Authors:  R M Lewitt
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements.

Authors:  Vladimir Y Panin; Frank Kehren; Christian Michel; Michael Casey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Gerd Muehllehner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET.

Authors:  J M Ollinger
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Imaging performance of A-PET: a small animal PET camera.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp; Amy E Perkins; Chris A Cardi; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Austin Kuhn; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 3 Effect of sampling.

Authors:  S C Huang; E J Hoffman; M E Phelps; D E Kuhl
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Improved spatial resolution in PET scanners using sampling techniques.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Ryan Scheuermann; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

9.  Optimization of a fully 3D single scatter simulation algorithm for 3D PET.

Authors:  Roberto Accorsi; Lars-Eric Adam; Matthew E Werner; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.