Literature DB >> 21538202

Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization.

Alec Scharff1, John Palmer, Cathleen M Moore.   

Abstract

How is visual object perception limited by divided attention? Whereas some theories have proposed that it is not limited at all (unlimited capacity), others have proposed that divided attention introduces restrictive capacity limitations or serial processing (fixed capacity). We addressed this question using a task in which observers searched for instances of particular object categories, such as a moose or squirrel. We applied an extended simultaneous-sequential paradigm to test the fixed-capacity and unlimited-capacity models (Experiment 1). The results were consistent with fixed capacity and rejected unlimited capacity. We ascertained that these results were due to attention, and not to sensory interactions such as crowding, by repeating the experiment using a cuing paradigm with physically identical displays (Experiment 2). The results from both experiments were consistent with theories of object perception that have fixed capacity, and they rejected theories with unlimited capacity. Both serial and parallel models with fixed capacity remain viable alternatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21538202     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0101-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Divided attention and visual search for simple versus complex features.

Authors:  Elizabeth Thorpe Davis; Terry Shikano; Scott A Peterson; Rachel Keyes Michel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway?

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Simon J Thorpe; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Processing of one, two or four natural scenes in humans: the limits of parallelism.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Simon J Thorpe; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01

7.  Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.

Authors:  Tom Busey; John Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Two categorical stages of object recognition.

Authors:  E K Warrington; A M Taylor
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 10.  The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  14 in total

1.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The bandwidth of consolidation into visual short-term memory (VSTM) depends on the visual feature.

Authors:  James R Miller; Mark W Becker; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-08-01

4.  Information processing capacity in psychopathy: Effects of anomalous attention.

Authors:  Rachel K B Hamilton; Joseph P Newman
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2016-10-24

5.  Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.

Authors:  Nicole L Jardine; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Serial consolidation of orientation information into visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; Mark W Becker
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-16

8.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis.

Authors:  Joseph W Houpt; James T Townsend
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 10.  Exploring the relationship between perceptual learning and top-down attentional control.

Authors:  Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.