Literature DB >> 15617666

Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search.

Liqiang Huang1, Harold Pashler.   

Abstract

When a visual search task is very difficult (as when a small feature difference defines the target), even detection of a unique element may be substantially slowed by increases in display set size. This has been attributed to the influence of attentional capacity limits. We examined the influence of attentional capacity limits on three kinds of search task: difficult feature search (with a subtle featural difference), difficult conjunction search, and spatial-configuration search. In all 3 tasks, each trial contained sixteen items, divided into two eight-item sets. The two sets were presented either successively or simultaneously. Comparison of accuracy in successive versus simultaneous presentations revealed that attentional capacity limitations are present only in the case of spatial-configuration search. While the other two types of task were inefficient (as reflected in steep search slopes), no capacity limitations were evident. We conclude that the difficulty of a visual search task affects search efficiency but does not necessarily introduce attentional capacity limits.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15617666     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  20 in total

1.  Your own face is no more precious than others': Evidence from the simultaneous--sequential paradigm.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; Woo Hyun Jung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

3.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Extending the simultaneous-sequential paradigm to measure perceptual capacity for features and words.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Evidence for unlimited capacity processing of simple features in visual cortex.

Authors:  Alex L White; Erik Runeson; John Palmer; Zachary R Ernst; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Evidence of fixed capacity in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Alec Scharff; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

8.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Exploring the relationship between perceptual learning and top-down attentional control.

Authors:  Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.