Literature DB >> 23404158

Divided attention limits perception of 3-D object shapes.

Alec Scharff1, John Palmer, Cathleen M Moore.   

Abstract

Can one perceive multiple object shapes at once? We tested two benchmark models of object shape perception under divided attention: an unlimited-capacity and a fixed-capacity model. Under unlimited-capacity models, shapes are analyzed independently and in parallel. Under fixed-capacity models, shapes are processed at a fixed rate (as in a serial model). To distinguish these models, we compared conditions in which observers were presented with simultaneous or sequential presentations of a fixed number of objects (The extended simultaneous-sequential method: Scharff, Palmer, & Moore, 2011a, 2011b). We used novel physical objects as stimuli, minimizing the role of semantic categorization in the task. Observers searched for a specific object among similar objects. We ensured that non-shape stimulus properties such as color and texture could not be used to complete the task. Unpredictable viewing angles were used to preclude image-matching strategies. The results rejected unlimited-capacity models for object shape perception and were consistent with the predictions of a fixed-capacity model. In contrast, a task that required observers to recognize 2-D shapes with predictable viewing angles yielded an unlimited capacity result. Further experiments ruled out alternative explanations for the capacity limit, leading us to conclude that there is a fixed-capacity limit on the ability to perceive 3-D object shapes.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23404158      PMCID: PMC5833208          DOI: 10.1167/13.2.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  37 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Attentional signatures of perception: multiple object tracking reveals the automaticity of contour interpolation.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Everett Mettler; Vicky Tsoi; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Matthew F Peterson; Binh T Pham; Jason A Droll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Set-size effects in visual search: the effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants.

Authors:  Z Pizlo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The attention operating characteristic: examples from visual search.

Authors:  G Sperling; M J Melchner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The uncrowded window of object recognition.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  Your own face is no more precious than others': Evidence from the simultaneous--sequential paradigm.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; Woo Hyun Jung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

2.  The capacity limitations of orientation summary statistics.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  A lack of experience-dependent plasticity after more than a decade of recovered sight.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huber; Jason M Webster; Alyssa A Brewer; Donald I A MacLeod; Brian A Wandell; Geoffrey M Boynton; Alex R Wade; Ione Fine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-03

4.  Summary statistics of size: fixed processing capacity for multiple ensembles but unlimited processing capacity for single ensembles.

Authors:  Mouna Attarha; Cathleen M Moore; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Endogenous cueing effects for detection can be accounted for by a decision model of selective attention.

Authors:  Miranda L Johnson; John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.