Literature DB >> 21534012

Twelve-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve at a single Japanese center.

Koichi Arinaga1, Shuji Fukunaga, Hiroshi Tomoeda, Hidetsugu Hori, Tomohiro Ueda, Ryusuke Mori, Shigeaki Aoyagi.   

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the long-term results of implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial (CEP) valve in the aortic position. Between January 1996 and December 2007, 244 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement using the CEP valve were enrolled in this study. A 19-mm valve was used in 39 patients, a 21-mm valve in 94 patients, a 23-mm valve in 81 patients, and a 25-mm valve in 30 patients. The early and the late results were evaluated. Furthermore, echocardiographic examination was performed at follow-up. There were 5 early deaths, with an early mortality rate of 2.0%. Follow-up was performed in 95.4% of the survivors of the operation for a mean period of 4.1 years. Actuarial survival rates at 5, 10, and 12 years were 85.3 ± 2.8, 80.0 ± 3.7 and 70.0 ± 9.8%, respectively. Thromboembolism was observed in 6 patients, endocarditis in 2 patients, reoperation in 4 patients, and structural valve deterioration in 2 patients. Actuarial freedoms from thromboembolism, endocarditis, and reoperation at 10 years were 96.9 ± 0.14, 97.7 ± 0.16, and 97.0 ± 0.16%, respectively. Echocardiographic examination revealed that the pressure gradients across the valve prosthesis for valves of each size were acceptable. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly in all valve sizes. The long-term results of implantation of the CEP bioprosthesis in the aortic position were satisfactory. The CEP bioprosthesis maintained its hemodynamic performance even as late as 10 years after implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21534012     DOI: 10.1007/s10047-011-0566-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Artif Organs        ISSN: 1434-7229            Impact factor:   1.731


  15 in total

1.  Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  M K Banbury; D M Cosgrove; J A White; E H Blackstone; R W Frater; J E Okies
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Hemodynamic stability during 17 years of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Michael K Banbury; Delos M Cosgrove; James D Thomas; Eugene H Blackstone; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; J Edward Okies; Robert M Frater
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.

Authors:  Cary W Akins; D Craig Miller; Marko I Turina; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary L Grunkemeier; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Tirone E David; Eric G Butchart; David H Adams; David M Shahian; Siegfried Hagl; John E Mayer; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  15-year experience with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis.

Authors:  N C Poirer; L C Pelletier; M Pellerin; M Carrier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  V Rao; W R Jamieson; J Ivanov; S Armstrong; T E David
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant.

Authors:  Naoji Hanayama; George T Christakis; Hari R Mallidi; Campbell D Joyner; Stephen E Fremes; Christopher D Morgan; Peter R R Mitoff; Bernard S Goldman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: intermediate results in 420 patients.

Authors:  M Aupart; P Neville; X Dreyfus; Y Meurisse; A Sirinelli; M Marchand
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Long-term evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position.

Authors:  P Perier; S Mihaileanu; J N Fabiani; A Deloche; S Chauvaud; A Jindani; A Carpentier
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.620

10.  Hemodynamic evaluation and midterm outcome of aortic valve replacement with size 19 Perimount prosthetic valve.

Authors:  Pradeep Narayan; Barnaby C Reeves; Syad I A Rizvi; Kayvan Shokrollahi; Huda Ismail; Gianni D Angelini; Angus Nightingale; Massimo Caputo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Artificial Organs 2011: the year in review.

Authors:  Y Sawa; E Tatsumi; A Funakubo; T Horiuchi; K Iwasaki; A Kishida; T Masuzawa; K Matsuda; A Myoui; M Nishimura; T Nishimura; S Tokunaga; Y Tomizawa; T Tomo; T Tsukiya; T Yamaoka
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Selection of prosthetic valve and evidence--need for the development of Japan's own guidelines.

Authors:  Akira Sezai; Motomi Shiono
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 1.520

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.