| Literature DB >> 21527003 |
Pankaj Pawar1, Suhit Gilda, Siddhesh Sharma, Suresh Jagtap, Anant Paradkar, Kakasaheb Mahadik, Prabhakar Ranjekar, Abhay Harsulkar.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is marked with chronic inflammation of intestinal epithelium driven by oxidative stress. Traditional treatments with plant extracts gained renewed interest due to their ability to ameliorate the multi factorial conditions like inflammation. We investigated the beneficial effects of Withania somnifera in Trinitro Benzyl Sulfonic Acid (TNBS) induced experimental IBD through a rectally applicable formulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21527003 PMCID: PMC3103490 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Comparative Antioxidant Free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory activity of Withania somnifera
| % LPO Inhibition | % NO Scavenging | % H2O2 Scavenging | Reducing power | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 12.67 ± 0.83 | 85.71 ± 0.72 | 10.55 ± 0.97 | 59.84 ± 0.79 | 0.4996 ± 1.34 | 0.4177 ± 1.53 |
| 200 | 51.73 ± 1.26 | 91.54 ± 0.98 | 14.30 ± 0.86 | 63.52 ± 0.85 | 0.5247 ± 1.21 | 0.5647 ± 1.04 |
| 300 | 65.02 ± 1.13 | 96.05 ± 0.86 | 14.41 ± 0.93 | 73.59 ± 0.98 | 0.6137 ± 0.95 | 0.6804 ± 1.02 |
| 400 | 75.70 ± 1.23 | 99.09 ± 0.84 | 14.75 ± 0.96 | 76.30 ± 1.13 | 0.7053 ± 0.89 | 0.7106 ± 1.21 |
| 500 | 95.59 ± 0.56 | 99.97 ± 1.36 | 14.77 ± 1.13 | 81.79 ± 1.23 | 0.7972 ± 0.58 | 0.8090 ± 0.96 |
Malondialdehyde levels as an indicator of lipid peroxidation
| Lipid peroxidation in rat intestine | Healthy control | Positive control | Negative control | WSAE* treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11.65 | 18.52 | 23.68 | 17.79 |
| 2 | 12.42 | 17.26 | 24.3 | 19.03 |
| 3 | 9.63 | 19.39 | 22.34 | 19.66 |
| 4 | 13.53 | 18.3 | 21.76 | 16.68 |
| 5 | 12.1 | 19.92 | 22.88 | 18.52 |
| 6 | 10.46 | 18.59 | 22.17 | 17.23 |
Abbreviation: * = Withania somnifera aqueous extract
# = Average
** = Standard deviation
Effect of various treatments on macroscopic score analysis
| Group name | Score rate | N* | Mean | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| HC** | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.16 |
| NC | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2.83 |
| TC | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1.60 |
| PC | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2.00 |
**HC: Healthy control; NC: colitis control; TC: Test control; PC: Positive control;
*n: number of rats per group.
Figure 1Histopathological features of colon section of a). healthy control rat, b). rat with TNBS treatment, c). rat with TNBS +WSREF treatment, d). rat with TNBS+Mesalamine treatment.
Figure 2Change in colon weight as a function of period of treatment. HC: Healthy control, CC: Colitis control, WS: WSREF treated, STD: Standard (Mesalamine) control.
Figure 3Change in rat weight as a function of period of treatment.