Literature DB >> 21519989

Optimization of the number of selectable channels for spine phased array coils for transverse imaging.

Susumu Moriya1, Yukio Miki, Tsuneo Yokobayashi, Akira Yamamoto, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Yoshiaki Komori, Koji Fujimoto, Mitsunori Ishikawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in transverse images acquired from spine phased array coils is improved by deactivating coils distant from the imaging region and to identify the optimum coil settings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers (five men, five women; average age 38 years) underwent transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine using four to one channels of a four-channel phased array coil for cervical imaging. The SNR of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), spinal cord, muscle tissue, intervertebral disc, vertebral body, and prevertebral soft tissue was measured for each coil combination.
RESULTS: In all measured regions, the SNR was the highest for images acquired using two coils; the SNR was significantly higher for two coils than for four coils in CSF, spinal cord, muscle tissue, intervertebral disc, vertebral body, and prevertebral soft tissue (P < 0.001, P = 0.019, P < 0.0001, P = 0.014, P = 0.010, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Deactivating two of the four coils used for sagittal sections, meaning that two coils are active, resulted in improved SNR for transverse images. Selecting the optimum number and combination of coils for each imaging cross section may enable acquisition of images with a better SNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21519989     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0532-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  11 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SNR-optimality of sum-of-squares reconstruction for phased-array magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Erik G Larsson; Deniz Erdogmus; Rui Yan; Jose C Principe; Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Image construction methods for phased array magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Deniz Erdogmus; Rui Yan; Erik G Larsson; Jose C Principe; Jeffrey R Fitzsimmons
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Volume imaging with MR phased arrays.

Authors:  C E Hayes; N Hattes; P B Roemer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Dual cervical thoracic coil for spine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Totterman; T H Foster; D B Plewes; J H Simon; S Ekholm; A Wicks
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  A 16-element phased-array head coil.

Authors:  J R Porter; S M Wright; A Reykowski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Switched array coils.

Authors:  H Requardt; J Offermann; P Erhard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  MR imaging using specialized coils.

Authors:  M R Fisher; B Barker; E G Amparo; G Brandt; M Brant-Zawadzki; H Hricak; C B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with continuous table movement at 3.0 T: initial experience compared with step-by-step MRA.

Authors:  Harald Kramer; Michael Zenge; Peter Schmitt; Christian Glaser; Maximilian F Reiser; Karin A Herrmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.