Literature DB >> 18605878

Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.

Andrew C Butler1, Jeffrey D Karpicke, Henry L Roediger.   

Abstract

Previous studies investigating posttest feedback have generally conceptualized feedback as a method for correcting erroneous responses, giving virtually no consideration to how feedback might promote learning of correct responses. Here, the authors show that when correct responses are made with low confidence, feedback serves to correct this initial metacognitive error, enhancing retention of low-confidence correct responses. In 2 experiments, subjects took an initial multiple-choice test on general knowledge facts and made a confidence judgment after each response. Feedback was provided for half of the questions, and retention was assessed by a final cued-recall test. Taking the initial test improved retention relative to not testing, and feedback further enhanced performance. Consistent with prior research, feedback improved retention by allowing subjects to correct initially erroneous responses. Of more importance, feedback also doubled the retention of correct low-confidence responses, relative to providing no feedback. The function of feedback is to correct both memory errors and metacognitive errors. (c) 2008 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18605878     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  43 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

3.  The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning.

Authors:  Matthew Jensen Hays; Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

4.  Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

5.  The Future of Medical Education: Assessing the Impact of Interventions on Long-Term Retention and Clinical Care.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Nathaniel D Raley
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

6.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

7.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children's and adults' vocabulary learning.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Nate Kornell; Bridgid Finn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-12

8.  Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

9.  Student pharmacists' perceptions of testing and study strategies.

Authors:  Nicholas E Hagemeier; Holly L Mason
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Self-testing Frequency on Examination Scores in a Pathophysiology Course.

Authors:  Peter C Panus; David W Stewart; Nicholas E Hagemeier; Jim C Thigpen; Lauren Brooks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.