Literature DB >> 21508442

Material efficiency studies for a Compton camera designed to measure characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted during proton beam radiotherapy.

Daniel Robertson1, Jerimy C Polf, Steve W Peterson, Michael T Gillin, Sam Beddar.   

Abstract

Prompt gamma rays emitted from biological tissues during proton irradiation carry dosimetric and spectroscopic information that can assist with treatment verification and provide an indication of the biological response of the irradiated tissues. Compton cameras are capable of determining the origin and energy of gamma rays. However, prompt gamma monitoring during proton therapy requires new Compton camera designs that perform well at the high gamma energies produced when tissues are bombarded with therapeutic protons. In this study we optimize the materials and geometry of a three-stage Compton camera for prompt gamma detection and calculate the theoretical efficiency of such a detector. The materials evaluated in this study include germanium, bismuth germanate (BGO), NaI, xenon, silicon and lanthanum bromide (LaBr(3)). For each material, the dimensions of each detector stage were optimized to produce the maximum number of relevant interactions. These results were used to predict the efficiency of various multi-material cameras. The theoretical detection efficiencies of the most promising multi-material cameras were then calculated for the photons emitted from a tissue-equivalent phantom irradiated by therapeutic proton beams ranging from 50 to 250 MeV. The optimized detector stages had a lateral extent of 10 × 10 cm(2) with the thickness of the initial two stages dependent on the detector material. The thickness of the third stage was fixed at 10 cm regardless of material. The most efficient single-material cameras were composed of germanium (3 cm) and BGO (2.5 cm). These cameras exhibited efficiencies of 1.15 × 10(-4) and 9.58 × 10(-5) per incident proton, respectively. The most efficient multi-material camera design consisted of two initial stages of germanium (3 cm) and a final stage of BGO, resulting in a theoretical efficiency of 1.26 × 10(-4) per incident proton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508442      PMCID: PMC3087185          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields.

Authors:  Ben Clasie; Andrew Wroe; Hanne Kooy; Nicolas Depauw; Jay Flanz; Harald Paganetti; Anatoly Rosenfeld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Prompt gamma-ray emission from biological tissues during proton irradiation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; G Ciangaru; M Gillin; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Visualization and Transport of Positron Emission from Proton Activation in vivo.

Authors:  G W Bennett; J O Archambeau; B E Archambeau; J I Meltzer; C L Wingate
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Optimizing a three-stage Compton camera for measuring prompt gamma rays emitted during proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  S W Peterson; D Robertson; J Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering.

Authors:  Stephen Peterson; Jerimy Polf; George Ciangaru; Steven J Frank; Martin Bues; Al Smith
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.

Authors:  Alfred Smith; Michael Gillin; Martin Bues; X Ronald Zhu; Kazumichi Suzuki; Radhe Mohan; Shiao Woo; Andrew Lee; Ritsko Komaki; James Cox; Kazuo Hiramoto; Hiroshi Akiyama; Takayuki Ishida; Toshie Sasaki; Koji Matsuda
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Measurement and calculation of characteristic prompt gamma ray spectra emitted during proton irradiation.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; M McCleskey; B T Roeder; A Spiridon; S Beddar; L Trache
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Secondary neutron dose during proton therapy using spot scanning.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Stefano Agosteo; Eros Pedroni; Jürgen Besserer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

  8 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The effects of Doppler broadening and detector resolution on the performance of three-stage Compton cameras.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Jerimy Polf; Steve Peterson; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Evaluation of a stochastic reconstruction algorithm for use in Compton camera imaging and beam range verification from secondary gamma emission during proton therapy.

Authors:  Dennis Mackin; Steve Peterson; Sam Beddar; Jerimy Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Compton-based prompt gamma imaging using ordered origin ensemble algorithm with resolution recovery in proton therapy.

Authors:  Zhiyang Yao; Yongshun Xiao; Zhiqiang Chen; Bo Wang; Qinhan Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Range Verification Methods in Particle Therapy: Underlying Physics and Monte Carlo Modeling.

Authors:  Aafke Christine Kraan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.