Literature DB >> 19746802

Variations in proton scanned beam dose delivery due to uncertainties in magnetic beam steering.

Stephen Peterson1, Jerimy Polf, George Ciangaru, Steven J Frank, Martin Bues, Al Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to develop a method to calculate and study the impact of fluctuations in the magnetic field strengths within the steering magnets in a proton scanning beam treatment nozzle on the dose delivered to the patient during a proton therapy treatment. First, an analytical relationship between magnetic field uncertainties in the steering magnets and the resulting lateral displacements in the position of the delivered scanned beam "dose spot" was established. Next, using a simple 3D dose calculation code and data from a validated Monte Carlo model of the proton scanning beam treatment nozzle, the uniform dose delivery to a 3D treatment volume was calculated. The dose distribution was then recalculated using the calculated lateral displacements due to magnetic field fluctuations to the proton pencil beam position. Using these two calculated dose distributions, the clinical effects of the magnetic field fluctuations were determined. A deliberate displacement of four adjacent spots either toward or away from each other was used to determine the "maximum" dose impact, while a random displacement of all spots was used to establish a more realistic clinical dose impact. Changes in the dose volume histogram (DVH) and the presence of hot and cold spots in the treatment volume were used to quantify the impact of dose-spot displacement. A general analytical relationship between magnetic field uncertainty and final dose-spot position is presented. This analytical relationship was developed such that it can be applied to study magnetic beam steering for any scanned beam nozzle design. Using this relationship the authors found for the example beam steering nozzle used in this study that deliberate lateral displacements of 0.5 mm or random lateral displacements of up to 1.0 mm produced a noticeable dose impact (5% hot spot) in the treatment volume. A noticeable impact (3% decrease in treatment volume coverage) on the DVH was observed for random displacements of up to 1.5 mm. For the scanning nozzle studied in this work, these displacement values correlated with an uncertainty value of 2.04% in the magnetic field values of the nozzle steering magnets. The authors conclude that fluctuations in the dose-spot delivery caused by uncertainty in the magnet fields used for beam steering could have clinically significant effects on the delivered dose distribution. Due to differences in the design and implementation of proton beam scanning nozzles at different treatment facilities, the effects of magnetic field fluctuations of dose delivery should be evaluated and understood for each specific nozzle design during clinical commissioning of the treatment nozzle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19746802     DOI: 10.1118/1.3175796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven E Schild; Joe Y Chang; Zhongxing Liao; Yu-Hui Chang; Zhifei Wen; Jiajian Shen; Joshua B Stoker; Xiaoning Ding; Yanle Hu; Narayan Sahoo; Michael G Herman; Carlos Vargas; Sameer Keole; William Wong; Martin Bues
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.

Authors:  Wenhua Cao; Gino J Lim; Andrew Lee; Yupeng Li; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Material efficiency studies for a Compton camera designed to measure characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted during proton beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Robertson; Jerimy C Polf; Steve W Peterson; Michael T Gillin; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  An investigation into the robustness of dynamically collimated proton therapy treatments.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of errors in spot size and spot position in robustly optimized pencil beam scanning proton-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) lung plans.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.