Literature DB >> 23298111

The effects of Doppler broadening and detector resolution on the performance of three-stage Compton cameras.

Dennis Mackin1, Jerimy Polf, Steve Peterson, Sam Beddar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors investigated how the characteristics of the detectors used in a three-stage Compton camera (CC) affect the CC's ability to accurately measure the emission distribution and energy spectrum of prompt gammas (PG) emitted by nuclear de-excitations during proton therapy. The detector characteristics they studied included the material (high-purity germanium [HPGe] and cadmium zinc telluride [CZT]), Doppler broadening (DB), and resolution (lateral, depth, and energy).
METHODS: The authors simulated three-stage HPGe and CZT CCs of various configurations, detecting gammas from point sources with energies ranging from 0.511 to 7.12 MeV. They also simulated a proton pencil beam irradiating a tissue target to study how the detector characteristics affect the PG data measured by CCs in a clinical proton therapy setting. They used three figures of merit: the distance of closest approach (DCA) and the point of closest approach (PCA) between the measured and actual position of the PG emission origin, and the calculated energy resolution.
RESULTS: For CCs with HPGe detectors, DB caused the DCA to be greater than 3 mm for 14% of the 6.13 MeV gammas and 20% of the 0.511 MeV gammas. For CCs with CZT detectors, DB caused the DCA to be greater than 3 mm for 18% of the 6.13 MeV gammas and 25% of the 0.511 MeV gammas. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the PCA in the ẑ direction for HPGe and CZT detectors ranged from 1.3 to 0.4 mm for gammas with incident energy ranging from 0.511 to 7.12 MeV. For CCs composed of HPGe detectors, the resolution of incident gamma energy calculated by the CC ranged from 6% to 1% for gammas with true incident energies from 0.511 to 7.12 MeV. For CCs composed of CZT detectors, the resolution of gamma energy calculated by the CC ranged from 10% to 1% for gammas with true incident energies from 0.511 to 7.12 MeV. For HPGe and CZT CCs in which all detector effect were included, the DCA was less than 3 mm for 75% and 68% of the detected gammas, respectively, and restricting gammas to those having energy greater than 2.0 MeV increased these percentages to 83% and 77% for HPGe and CZT, respectively. Distributions of the true gamma origins and the PCA after detector characteristics had been included showed good agreement on beam range and some loss of resolution for the lateral profile of the PG emission. Characteristic energy lines were evident in the calculated gamma energy spectrum.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors found the following: (1) DB is the dominant source of spatial and energy resolution loss in the CCs at all energy levels; (2) the largest difference in the spatial resolution of HPGe and CZT CCs is that the spatial resolution distributions of CZT have broader tails. The differences in the FWHM of these distributions are small; (3) the energy resolution of both HPGe and CZT three-stage CCs is adequate for PG spectroscopy; and (4) restricting the gammas to those having energy greater than 2.0 MeV can improve the achievable image resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23298111      PMCID: PMC3537711          DOI: 10.1118/1.4767756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Accuracy of the photon and electron physics in GEANT4 for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Emily Poon; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Margins for treatment planning of proton therapy.

Authors:  Simon J Thomas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Prompt gamma-ray emission from biological tissues during proton irradiation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; G Ciangaru; M Gillin; S Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimizing a three-stage Compton camera for measuring prompt gamma rays emitted during proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  S W Peterson; D Robertson; J Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Measurement and calculation of characteristic prompt gamma ray spectra emitted during proton irradiation.

Authors:  J C Polf; S Peterson; M McCleskey; B T Roeder; A Spiridon; S Beddar; L Trache
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Performance evaluation of a pixellated Ge Compton camera.

Authors:  M A Alnaaimi; G J Royle; W Ghoggali; E Banoqitah; I Cullum; R D Speller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  An electronically collimated gamma camera for single photon emission computed tomography. Part I: Theoretical considerations and design criteria.

Authors:  M Singh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Monte Carlo patient study on the comparison of prompt gamma and PET imaging for range verification in proton therapy.

Authors:  M Moteabbed; S España; H Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Material efficiency studies for a Compton camera designed to measure characteristic prompt gamma rays emitted during proton beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Daniel Robertson; Jerimy C Polf; Steve W Peterson; Michael T Gillin; Sam Beddar
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Progress in the Development of CdTe and CdZnTe Semiconductor Radiation Detectors for Astrophysical and Medical Applications.

Authors:  Stefano Del Sordo; Leonardo Abbene; Ezio Caroli; Anna Maria Mancini; Andrea Zappettini; Pietro Ubertini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  4 in total

1.  Feasibility Studies of a New Event Selection Method to Improve Spatial Resolution of Compton Imaging for Medical Applications.

Authors:  E Draeger; S Peterson; D Mackin; H Chen; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-10

Review 2.  In vivo range verification in particle therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi; Jerimy C Polf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Potentialities of High-Resolution 3-D CZT Drift Strip Detectors for Prompt Gamma-Ray Measurements in BNCT.

Authors:  Leonardo Abbene; Fabio Principato; Antonino Buttacavoli; Gaetano Gerardi; Manuele Bettelli; Andrea Zappettini; Saverio Altieri; Natalia Auricchio; Ezio Caroli; Silvia Zanettini; Nicoletta Protti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.