Literature DB >> 25399736

Comparing two correlated C indices with right-censored survival outcome: a one-shot nonparametric approach.

Le Kang1, Weijie Chen, Nicholas A Petrick, Brandon D Gallas.   

Abstract

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is often used as a summary index of the diagnostic ability in evaluating biomarkers when the clinical outcome (truth) is binary. When the clinical outcome is right-censored survival time, the C index, motivated as an extension of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, has been proposed by Harrell as a measure of concordance between a predictive biomarker and the right-censored survival outcome. In this work, we investigate methods for statistical comparison of two diagnostic or predictive systems, of which they could either be two biomarkers or two fixed algorithms, in terms of their C indices. We adopt a U-statistics-based C estimator that is asymptotically normal and develop a nonparametric analytical approach to estimate the variance of the C estimator and the covariance of two C estimators. A z-score test is then constructed to compare the two C indices. We validate our one-shot nonparametric method via simulation studies in terms of the type I error rate and power. We also compare our one-shot method with resampling methods including the jackknife and the bootstrap. Simulation results show that the proposed one-shot method provides almost unbiased variance estimations and has satisfactory type I error control and power. Finally, we illustrate the use of the proposed method with an example from the Framingham Heart Study.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C index; bootstrap; concordance; hypothesis testing; jackknife; power; type I error

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399736      PMCID: PMC4314453          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  36 in total

1.  An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction.

Authors:  Lloyd E Chambless; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The sensitivity and specificity of markers for event times.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Yingye Zheng; Thomas Lumley; Nancy Swords Jenny
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; A James O'Malley; Laura Mauri
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The concordance index C and the Mann-Whitney parameter Pr(X>Y) with randomly censored data.

Authors:  James A Koziol; Zhenyu Jia
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 7.  Problems and prediction in survival-data analysis.

Authors:  R Henderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.

Authors:  Olga V Demler; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Aiyi Liu; Ekaterina Eliseeva; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 1.701

10.  One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Colin B Begg
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  90 in total

1.  Machine Learning and Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in COPD.

Authors:  Matthew Moll; Dandi Qiao; Elizabeth A Regan; Gary M Hunninghake; Barry J Make; Ruth Tal-Singer; Michael J McGeachie; Peter J Castaldi; Raul San Jose Estepar; George R Washko; James M Wells; David LaFon; Matthew Strand; Russell P Bowler; MeiLan K Han; Jorgen Vestbo; Bartolome Celli; Peter Calverley; James Crapo; Edwin K Silverman; Brian D Hobbs; Michael H Cho
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Discriminative Accuracy of FEV1:FVC Thresholds for COPD-Related Hospitalization and Mortality.

Authors:  Surya P Bhatt; Pallavi P Balte; Joseph E Schwartz; Patricia A Cassano; David Couper; David R Jacobs; Ravi Kalhan; George T O'Connor; Sachin Yende; Jason L Sanders; Jason G Umans; Mark T Dransfield; Paulo H Chaves; Wendy B White; Elizabeth C Oelsner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Predictive approaches for drug combination discovery in cancer.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Madani Tonekaboni; Laleh Soltan Ghoraie; Venkata Satya Kumar Manem; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  On comparing 2 correlated C indices with censored survival data.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Han; Yilong Zhang; Yongzhao Shao
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Performance of the ABC Scores for Assessing the Risk of Stroke or Systemic Embolism and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48.

Authors:  David D Berg; Christian T Ruff; Petr Jarolim; Robert P Giugliano; Francesco Nordio; Hans J Lanz; Michele F Mercuri; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A deep learning model for early prediction of Alzheimer's disease dementia based on hippocampal magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Hongming Li; Mohamad Habes; David A Wolk; Yong Fan
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 21.566

7.  Potential Impact of Including Time to First Cigarette in Risk Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Fangyi Gu; Li C Cheung; Neal D Freedman; Hormuzd A Katki; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  A New Criterion for Pediatric AKI Based on the Reference Change Value of Serum Creatinine.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Sheng Nie; Aihua Zhang; Mao Jianhua; Hai-Peng Liu; Huimin Xia; Hong Xu; Zhangsuo Liu; Shipin Feng; Wei Zhou; Xuemei Liu; Yonghong Yang; Yuhong Tao; Yunlin Feng; Chunbo Chen; Mo Wang; Yan Zha; Jian-Hua Feng; Qingchu Li; Shuwang Ge; Jianghua Chen; Yongcheng He; Siyuan Teng; Chuanming Hao; Bi-Cheng Liu; Ying Tang; Li-Jun Wang; Jin-Lei Qi; Wenjuan He; Pinghong He; Youhua Liu; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Comparison of the Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in evaluating the prognosis of patients with operable and inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heng Fan; Zhen-Yi Shao; Yuan-Yuan Xiao; Zhi-Hui Xie; Wen Chen; Hua Xie; Guo-You Qin; Nai-Qing Zhao
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Spot urine sodium excretion as prognostic marker in acutely decompensated heart failure: the spironolactone effect.

Authors:  João Pedro Ferreira; Nicolas Girerd; Pedro Bettencourt Medeiros; Mário Santos; Henrique Cyrne Carvalho; Paulo Bettencourt; David Kénizou; Javed Butler; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.