Literature DB >> 21480744

Weber's illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand.

Matthew R Longo1, Patrick Haggard.   

Abstract

The perceived distance between touches on a single skin surface is larger on regions of high tactile sensitivity than those with lower acuity, an effect known as Weber's illusion. This illusion suggests that tactile size perception involves a representation of the perceived size of body parts preserving characteristics of the somatosensory homunculus. Here, we investigated how body shape is coded within this representation by comparing tactile distances presented in different orientations on the hand. Participants judged which of two tactile distances on the dorsum of their left hand felt larger. One distance was aligned with the proximodistal axis (along the hand), the other with the mediolateral axis (across the hand). Across distances were consistently perceived as larger than along ones. A second experiment showed that this effect is specific to the hairy skin of the hand dorsum and does not occur on glabrous skin of the palm. A third experiment demonstrated that this bias reflects orientation on the hand surface, rather than an eye- or torso-centered reference frame. These results mirror known orientational anisotropies of both tactile acuity and of tactile receptive fields (RFs) of cortical neurons. We suggest that the dorsum of the hand is implicitly represented as wider than it actually is and that the shape of tactile RFs may partly explain distortions of mental body representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21480744     DOI: 10.1037/a0021921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  47 in total

1.  Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-02-11

2.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Authors:  Elena Calzolari; Elena Azañón; Matthew Danvers; Giuseppe Vallar; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Long- but not short-term tool-use changes hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Jason P Schacher; Cory Scammel; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The visual and haptic contributions to hand perception.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-13

6.  Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations.

Authors:  Elisa Canzoneri; Silvia Ubaldi; Valentina Rastelli; Alessandra Finisguerra; Michela Bassolino; Andrea Serino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Tactile distance anisotropy on the feet.

Authors:  Kelda Manser-Smith; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The longer the reference, the shorter the legs: How response modality affects body perception.

Authors:  Giorgia Tosi; Daniele Romano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Chubby hands or little fingers: sex differences in hand representation.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-03

Review 10.  What can errors tell us about body representations?

Authors:  Jared Medina; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.