Literature DB >> 28396426

Adaptation aftereffects reveal that tactile distance is a basic somatosensory feature.

Elena Calzolari1,2, Elena Azañón3, Matthew Danvers1, Giuseppe Vallar2,4, Matthew R Longo1.   

Abstract

The stage at which processing of tactile distance occurs is still debated. We addressed this issue by implementing an adaptation-aftereffect paradigm with passive touch. We demonstrated the presence of a strong aftereffect, induced by the simultaneous presentation of pairs of tactile stimuli. After adaptation to two different distances, one on each hand, participants systematically perceived a subsequent stimulus delivered to the hand adapted to the smaller distance as being larger. We further investigated the nature of the aftereffects, demonstrating that they are orientation- and skin-region-specific, occur even when just one hand is adapted, do not transfer either contralaterally or across the palm and dorsum, and are defined in a skin-centered, rather than an external, reference frame. These characteristics of tactile distance aftereffects are similar to those of low-level visual aftereffects, supporting the idea that distance perception arises at early stages of tactile processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; aftereffects; somatosensory processing; tactile distance; touch

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28396426      PMCID: PMC5410818          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614979114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  57 in total

1.  Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity?

Authors:  S Suzuki
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Changing reference frames during the encoding of tactile events.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  An object-centered aftereffect of a latent material property: A squishiness visual aftereffect, not causality adaptation.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Kirstie Petrie; Regan Gallagher; Kielan Yarrow
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Categorical perception of tactile distance.

Authors:  Frances Le Cornu Knight; Matthew R Longo; Andrew J Bremner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-02-19

5.  The cutaneous "rabbit": a perceptual illusion.

Authors:  F A Geldard; C E Sherrick
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Tactile short-term memory.

Authors:  E Q Gilson; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The perception of distance and location for dual tactile pressures.

Authors:  B G Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

9.  Spatial summation of pain in humans investigated using transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Emily Reid; Daniel Harvie; Rohan Miegel; Charles Spence; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Weber's illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  11 in total

1.  The recalibration of tactile perception during tool use is body-part specific.

Authors:  Luke E Miller; Andrew Cawley-Bennett; Matthew R Longo; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  No evidence for sex differences in tactile distance anisotropy.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contingent adaptation in masking and surround suppression.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; David J Heeger; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

5.  An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatial Perception.

Authors:  Lux Li; Arielle Chan; Shah M Iqbal; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Tactile distance illusions reflect a coherent stretch of tactile space.

Authors:  Federico Fiori; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Assessing the spatial distribution of cervical spinal cord activity during tactile stimulation of the upper extremity in humans with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth A Weber; Yufen Chen; Monica Paliwal; Christine S Law; Benjamin S Hopkins; Sean Mackey; Yasin Dhaher; Todd B Parrish; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  A Conceptual Model of Tactile Processing across Body Features of Size, Shape, Side, and Spatial Location.

Authors:  Luigi Tamè; Elena Azañón; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

9.  Hand Posture Modulates Perceived Tactile Distance.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Commentary: An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatial Perception.

Authors:  Jack Brooks
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.