Literature DB >> 32700199

The longer the reference, the shorter the legs: How response modality affects body perception.

Giorgia Tosi1, Daniele Romano2,3.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest in the characterization of the internal body model: a stored representation of the metric properties of the body. Tactile Distance Task (TDT) is an experimental procedure for assessing the body metric, based on the perception of distances between tactile stimuli. We aimed at ruling out potential cognitive confounds: the body part being touched, the response estimation method being used, and the replicability of the results. Crucially, we compared two scoring indices (Global shape index vs. Misestimation of the distance) that have been used in the literature assessing the unique contribution of each score. Our data revealed a distortion of body metric perception of the leg. In particular, we found a more substantial reduction in proximo-distal distances rather than in the medio-lateral axis. TDT turned out to be a reliable and replicable method producing consistent results applicable to different body parts. The global shape index was shown to be particularly resistant to contextual experimental factors, while the Misestimation resulted in being affected by the estimation modalities, revealing that the verbal response was the most precise method. Finally, we provided substantial support for the combined use of the two indices as they were shown to give complementary information about body metric representation distortions.

Keywords:  Body metric; Leg representation; Misestimation; Multidimensional scaling; Tactile distance perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32700199     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02074-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

1.  Parametric studies of dorsal horn neurons responding to tactile stimulation.

Authors:  P B Brown; J L Fuchs; D N Tapper
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The influence of vision, touch, and proprioception on body representation of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Anouk Keizer; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2018-02-02

3.  Mapping the internal geometry of tactile space.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Olga Golubova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Quantitative measurements of receptive field changes during antagonism of GABAergic transmission in primary somatosensory cortex of cats.

Authors:  K D Alloway; P Rosenthal; H Burton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A 2.5-D representation of the human hand.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Weber's illusion and body shape: anisotropy of tactile size perception on the hand.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Implicit body representations and tactile spatial remapping.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo; Flavia Mancini; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2015-07-18
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  No evidence for sex differences in tactile distance anisotropy.

Authors:  Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Waiting longer, feeling fatter: Effects of response delay on tactile distance estimation and confidence in females with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Manja M Engel; Stephen Gadsby; Andrew W Corcoran; Anouk Keizer; H Chris Dijkerman; Jakob Hohwy
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Assess and rehabilitate body representations via (neuro)robotics: An emergent perspective.

Authors:  Gaia Risso; Michela Bassolino
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.493

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.