Literature DB >> 30353213

Long- but not short-term tool-use changes hand representation.

Lara A Coelho1, Jason P Schacher2,3, Cory Scammel2,3, Jon B Doan3, Claudia L R Gonzalez2.   

Abstract

Tool-use has been found to change body representation. For example, participants who briefly used a mechanical grabber to pick up objects perceived their forearms to be longer immediately after its use (e.g., Cardinali et al., Curr Biol 19(12):R478-R479, 2009; they incorporated the tool into their perceived arm size). While some studies have investigated the long-term effects of tool-use on body representation, none of these studies have used a tool that encapsulates the entire body part (e.g., a glove). Moreover, the relationship between tool-use and the body model (the representation of the body's spatial characteristics) has yet to be explored. To test this, we recruited 19 elite baseball players (EBP) and 18 age-matched controls to participate in a hand representation task. We included EBP because of their many years (8+) of training with a tool (baseball glove). The task required participants to place their hands underneath a covered glass tabletop (no vision of their hands), and to point to where they believed 10 locations (the tips and bases of each finger) were on their hands (Coelho et al., Psychol Res 81(6):1224-1231, 2017). Each point's XY coordinates was tracked using an Optotrak camera. From these coordinates, we mapped out the participants perceived hand size. The results showed that when compared to the controls, EBP underestimated hand width and finger length of both hands. This indicates that long-term tool use produces changes in the body model for both, the trained and untrained hands. We conducted a follow-up study to examine if 15 min of glove use would change perceived hand size in control participants. Novice baseball players (participants without baseball experience: NBP) were recruited and hand maps were derived before and after 15 min of active catching with a glove. Results showed no significant differences between the pre and post hand maps. When we compared between the two experiments, the EBP showed smaller hand representation for both hand width and finger length, than the NBP. We discuss these results in relation to theories of altered body ownership.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body model; Body representation; Hand; Plasticity; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30353213     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5408-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Authors:  Y Hu; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Cortical activations in primary and secondary motor areas for complex bimanual movements in professional pianists.

Authors:  L Jäncke; N J Shah; M Peters
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

3.  The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping.

Authors:  Y Hu; R Eagleson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Intermanual transfer in a simple motor task.

Authors:  Katrin Schulze; Eileen Lüders; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Short-term plasticity of the primary somatosensory cortex during tool use.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Yvonne Rothemund; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Michael Rotte
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Skill level, vision, and proprioception in simple one-hand catching.

Authors:  M G Fischman; T Schneider
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 8.  Tools for the body (schema).

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  An exploration of the drive for muscularity in adolescent boys and girls.

Authors:  D R McCreary; D K Sasse
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2000-05

Review 10.  Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders.

Authors:  Hans Wijbrand Hoek; Daphne van Hoeken
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.861

View more
  6 in total

1.  Growing into your hand: the developmental trajectory of the body model.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Selective effects of a brain tumor on the metric representation of the hand: a pre- versus post-surgery comparison.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Giorgia Committeri; Marco Ciavarro; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Anna Sedda; Teresa Esteban; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Familiarity with a Tool Influences Peripersonal Space and Primary Motor Cortex Excitability of Muscles Involved in Haptic Contact.

Authors:  M Biggio; A Bisio; L Avanzino; P Ruggeri; M Bove
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  Proprioceptive errors in the localization of hand landmarks: What can be learnt about the hand metric representation?

Authors:  Valeria Peviani; Gabriella Bottini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The perceived size of the implicit representation of the dorsum and palm of the hand.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.