PURPOSE: To assess image quality and image-guidance capabilities of a cone-beam CT based small-animal image-guided irradiation unit (micro-IGRT). METHODS: A micro-IGRT system has been developed in collaboration with the authors' laboratory as a means to study the radiobiological effects of conformal radiation dose distributions in small animals. The system, the X-Rad 225Cx, consists of a 225 kVp x-ray tube and a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector mounted on a rotational C-arm gantry and is capable of both fluoroscopic x-ray and cone-beam CT imaging, as well as image-guided placement of the radiation beams. Image quality (voxel noise, modulation transfer, CT number accuracy, and geometric accuracy characteristics) was assessed using water cylinder and micro-CT test phantoms. Image guidance was tested by analyzing the dose delivered to radiochromic films fixed to BB's through the end-to-end process of imaging, targeting the center of the BB, and irradiation of the film/BB in order to compare the offset between the center of the field and the center of the BB. Image quality and geometric studies were repeated over a 5-7 month period to assess stability. RESULTS: CT numbers reported were found to be linear (R2 0.998) and the noise for images of homogeneous water phantom was 30 HU at imaging doses of approximately 1 cGy (to water). The presampled MTF at 50% and 10% reached 0.64 and 1.35 mm(-1), respectively. Targeting accuracy by means of film irradiations was shown to have a mean displacement error of [deltax, deltay, deltaz] = [-0.12, -0.05, -0.02] mm, with standard deviations of [0.02, 0.20, 0.17] mm. The system has proven to be stable over time, with both the image quality and image-guidance performance being reproducible for the duration of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The micro-IGRT unit provides soft-tissue imaging of small-animal anatomy at acceptable imaging doses (< or =1 cGy). The geometric accuracy and targeting systems permit dose placement with submillimeter accuracy and precision. The system has proven itself to be stable over 2 yr of routine laboratory use (>1800 irradiations) and provides a platform for the exploration of targeted radiation effects in small-animal models.
PURPOSE: To assess image quality and image-guidance capabilities of a cone-beam CT based small-animal image-guided irradiation unit (micro-IGRT). METHODS: A micro-IGRT system has been developed in collaboration with the authors' laboratory as a means to study the radiobiological effects of conformal radiation dose distributions in small animals. The system, the X-Rad 225Cx, consists of a 225 kVp x-ray tube and a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector mounted on a rotational C-arm gantry and is capable of both fluoroscopic x-ray and cone-beam CT imaging, as well as image-guided placement of the radiation beams. Image quality (voxel noise, modulation transfer, CT number accuracy, and geometric accuracy characteristics) was assessed using water cylinder and micro-CT test phantoms. Image guidance was tested by analyzing the dose delivered to radiochromic films fixed to BB's through the end-to-end process of imaging, targeting the center of the BB, and irradiation of the film/BB in order to compare the offset between the center of the field and the center of the BB. Image quality and geometric studies were repeated over a 5-7 month period to assess stability. RESULTS: CT numbers reported were found to be linear (R2 0.998) and the noise for images of homogeneous water phantom was 30 HU at imaging doses of approximately 1 cGy (to water). The presampled MTF at 50% and 10% reached 0.64 and 1.35 mm(-1), respectively. Targeting accuracy by means of film irradiations was shown to have a mean displacement error of [deltax, deltay, deltaz] = [-0.12, -0.05, -0.02] mm, with standard deviations of [0.02, 0.20, 0.17] mm. The system has proven to be stable over time, with both the image quality and image-guidance performance being reproducible for the duration of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The micro-IGRT unit provides soft-tissue imaging of small-animal anatomy at acceptable imaging doses (< or =1 cGy). The geometric accuracy and targeting systems permit dose placement with submillimeter accuracy and precision. The system has proven itself to be stable over 2 yr of routine laboratory use (>1800 irradiations) and provides a platform for the exploration of targeted radiation effects in small-animal models.
Authors: David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Louise Y Du; Joseph Umoh; Hristo N Nikolov; Steven I Pollmann; Ting-Yim Lee; David W Holdsworth Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: S Stojadinovic; D A Low; A J Hope; M Vicic; J O Deasy; J Cui; D Khullar; P J Parikh; K T Malinowski; E W Izaguirre; S Mutic; P W Grigsby Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Edward E Graves; Hu Zhou; Raja Chatterjee; Paul J Keall; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Christopher H Contag; Arthur L Boyer Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Hu Zhou; Manuel Rodriguez; Fred van den Haak; Geoffrey Nelson; Rahil Jogani; Jiali Xu; Xinzhi Zhu; Yongjiang Xian; Phuoc T Tran; Dean W Felsher; Paul J Keall; Edward E Graves Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joseph Newton; Mark Oldham; Andrew Thomas; Yifan Li; John Adamovics; David G Kirsch; Shiva Das Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Rachel E McCarroll; Ashley E Rubinstein; Charles V Kingsley; Jinzhong Yang; Peiying Yang; Laurence E Court Journal: J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.232
Authors: Gregory N Gan; Cem Altunbas; John J Morton; Justin Eagles; Jennifer Backus; Wayne Dzingle; David Raben; Antonio Jimeno Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Lotte Ejr Schyns; Daniëlle Bp Eekers; Brent van der Heyden; Isabel P Almeida; Ana Vaniqui; Frank Verhaegen Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Marco Barazas; Alessia Gasparini; Yike Huang; Asli Küçükosmanoğlu; Stefano Annunziato; Peter Bouwman; Wendy Sol; Ariena Kersbergen; Natalie Proost; Renske de Korte-Grimmerink; Marieke van de Ven; Jos Jonkers; Gerben R Borst; Sven Rottenberg Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Laurel M Burk; Christy R Inscoe; Michael J Hadsell; Pavel Chtcheprov; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 3.609