Literature DB >> 21452712

An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI.

Melanie Freed1, Jacco A de Zwart, Jennifer T Loud, Riham H El Khouli, Kyle J Myers, Mark H Greene, Jeff H Duyn, Aldo Badano.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, the authors aim to develop a physical, tissue-mimicking phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI protocols. The objective of this phantom is to address the need for improved standardization in breast MRI and provide a platform for evaluating the influence of image protocol parameters on lesion detection and discrimination. Quantitative comparisons between patient and phantom image properties are presented.
METHODS: The phantom is constructed using a mixture of lard and egg whites, resulting in a random structure with separate adipose- and glandular-mimicking components. T1 and T2 relaxation times of the lard and egg components of the phantom were estimated at 1.5 T from inversion recovery and spin-echo scans, respectively, using maximum-likelihood methods. The image structure was examined quantitatively by calculating and comparing spatial covariance matrices of phantom and patient images. A static, enhancing lesion was introduced by creating a hollow mold with stereolithography and filling it with a gadolinium-doped water solution.
RESULTS: Measured phantom relaxation values fall within 2 standard errors of human values from the literature and are reasonably stable over 9 months of testing. Comparison of the covariance matrices of phantom and patient data demonstrates that the phantom and patient data have similar image structure. Their covariance matrices are the same to within error bars in the anterior-posterior direction and to within about two error bars in the right-left direction. The signal from the phantom's adipose-mimicking material can be suppressed using active fat-suppression protocols. A static, enhancing lesion can also be included with the ability to change morphology and contrast agent concentration.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have constructed a phantom and demonstrated its ability to mimic human breast images in terms of key physical properties that are relevant to breast MRI. This phantom provides a platform for the optimization and standardization of breast MRI imaging protocols for lesion detection and characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21452712      PMCID: PMC3033878          DOI: 10.1118/1.3533899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  46 in total

1.  Parameter estimation from Rician-distributed data sets using a maximum likelihood estimator: application to T1 and perfusion measurements.

Authors:  O T Karlsen; R Verhagen; W M Bovée
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Strategies for shimming the breast.

Authors:  Nimrod Maril; Christopher M Collins; Robert L Greenman; Robert E Lenkinski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Relaxation times of breast tissue at 1.5T and 3T measured using IDEAL.

Authors:  Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Bruce Daniel; Huanzhou Yu; Anne Sawyer-Glover; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.

Authors:  D R Dance; R A Hunt; P R Bakic; A D A Maidment; M Sandborg; G Ullman; G Alm Carlsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Of cup and bra size: reply to a prospective study of breast size and premenopausal breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Anita Ringberg; Erika Bågeman; Carsten Rose; Christian Ingvar; Helena Jernström
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Correction of errors caused by imperfect inversion pulses in MR imaging measurement of T1 relaxation times.

Authors:  P B Kingsley; R J Ogg; W E Reddick; R G Steen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Use of a modified polysaccharide gel in developing a realistic breast phantom for MRI.

Authors:  G P Mazzara; R W Briggs; Z Wu; B G Steinbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Lorena Gutierrez; Moriel S NessAiver; W Bradford Carter; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca S Lewis; Olga B Ioffe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  14 in total

1.  Development and characterization of a dynamic lesion phantom for the quantitative evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Prasanna Hariharan; Matthew R Myers; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom.

Authors:  Michael Shulman; Eunyoung Cho; Bipin Aasi; Jin Cheng; Saiee Nithiyanantham; Nicole Waddell; Dafna Sussman
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Development of a patient-specific two-compartment anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Nicolas D Prionas; George W Burkett; Sarah E McKenney; Lin Chen; Robin L Stern; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  An anatomically realistic temperature phantom for radiofrequency heating measurements.

Authors:  Nadine N Graedel; Jonathan R Polimeni; Bastien Guerin; Borjan Gagoski; Giorgio Bonmassar; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Design of a breast phantom for quantitative MRI.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Lisa J Wilmes; Sheye O Aliu; David C Newitt; Ella F Jones; Michael A Boss; Karl F Stupic; Stephen E Russek; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Joshua R Biller; Jana G Delfino; Michael A Boss; Mark D Does; Jeffrey L Evelhoch; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Gunter; R Scott Hinks; Stuart W Hoffman; Geena Kim; Riccardo Lattanzi; Xiaojuan Li; Luca Marinelli; Gregory J Metzger; Pratik Mukherjee; Robert J Nordstrom; Adele P Peskin; Elena Perez; Stephen E Russek; Berkman Sahiner; Natalie Serkova; Amita Shukla-Dave; Michael Steckner; Karl F Stupic; Lisa J Wilmes; Holden H Wu; Huiming Zhang; Edward F Jackson; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Synthesized tissue-equivalent dielectric phantoms using salt and polyvinylpyrrolidone solutions.

Authors:  Carlotta Ianniello; Jacco A de Zwart; Qi Duan; Cem M Deniz; Leeor Alon; Jae-Seung Lee; Riccardo Lattanzi; Ryan Brown
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Reproducible automated breast density measure with no ionizing radiation using fat-water decomposition MRI.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Alison T Stopeck; Yi Gao; Marilyn T Marron; Betsy C Wertheim; Maria I Altbach; Jean-Philippe Galons; Denise J Roe; Fang Wang; Gertraud Maskarinec; Cynthia A Thomson; Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Adele P Peskin; Lisa J Wilmes; Sheye O Aliu; Ella F Jones; Wen Li; John Kornak; David C Newitt; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  3D-printed breast phantom for multi-purpose and multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Yaoyao He; Yulin Liu; Brandon A Dyer; John M Boone; Shanshan Liu; Tiao Chen; Fenglian Zheng; Ye Zhu; Yong Sun; Yi Rong; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.