Literature DB >> 26949897

Design of a breast phantom for quantitative MRI.

Kathryn E Keenan1, Lisa J Wilmes2, Sheye O Aliu2, David C Newitt2, Ella F Jones2, Michael A Boss1, Karl F Stupic1, Stephen E Russek1, Nola M Hylton2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present a breast phantom designed to enable quantitative assessment of measurements of T1 relaxation time, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and other attributes of breast tissue, with long-term support from a national metrology institute.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A breast phantom was created with two independent, interchangeable units for diffusion and T1 /T2 relaxation, each with flexible outer shells. The T1 unit was filled with corn syrup solution and grapeseed oil to mimic the relaxation behavior of fibroglandular and fatty tissues, respectively. The diffusion unit contains plastic tubes filled with aqueous solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to modulate the ADC. The phantom was imaged at 1.5T and 3.0T using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners and common breast coils from multiple manufacturers to assess T1 and T2 relaxation time and ADC values.
RESULTS: The fibroglandular mimic exhibited target T1 values on 1.5T and 3.0T clinical systems (25-75 percentile range: 1289 to 1400 msec and 1533 to 1845 msec, respectively) across all bore temperatures. PVP solutions mimicked the range of ADC values from malignant tumors to normal breast tissue (40% PVP median: 633 × 10(-6) mm(2) /s to 0% PVP median: 2231 × 10(-6) mm(2) /s) at temperatures of 17-24°C. The interchangeable phantom units allowed both the diffusion and T1 /T2 units to be tested on the left and right sides of the coil to assess any variation.
CONCLUSION: This phantom enables T1 and ADC measurements, fits in a variety of clinical breast coils, and can serve as a quality control tool to facilitate the standardization of quantitative measurements for breast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:610-619.
© 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient; breast MRI; phantoms; quality control; relaxation; tissue mimic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26949897      PMCID: PMC4983524          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  15 in total

Review 1.  Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies.

Authors:  Gary H Glover; Bryon A Mueller; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Thomas T Liu; Douglas N Greve; James T Voyvodic; Jerod Rasmussen; Gregory G Brown; David B Keator; Vince D Calhoun; Hyo Jong Lee; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon; Michele Diaz; Daniel S O'Leary; Syam Gadde; Adrian Preda; Kelvin O Lim; Cynthia G Wible; Hal S Stern; Aysenil Belger; Gregory McCarthy; Burak Ozyurt; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  A D Barker; C C Sigman; G J Kelloff; N M Hylton; D A Berry; L J Esserman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Development of a novel breast MRI phantom for quality control.

Authors:  Betty Tuong; Ian Gardiner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Revathi S Murthy; Ali Ziadloo; Steven W White; Kimberly H Allison; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Christiane D Mullins; Brenda F Kurland; Michael D Allain; Wendy B DeMartini; Peter R Eby; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Gradient nonlinearity correction to improve apparent diffusion coefficient accuracy and standardization in the american college of radiology imaging network 6698 breast cancer trial.

Authors:  David C Newitt; Ek T Tan; Lisa J Wilmes; Thomas L Chenevert; John Kornak; Luca Marinelli; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Semi-automated analysis for MRI of breast tumors.

Authors:  S C Partridge; E J Heumann; N M Hylton
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1999

8.  Use of a modified polysaccharide gel in developing a realistic breast phantom for MRI.

Authors:  G P Mazzara; R W Briggs; Z Wu; B G Steinbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Application of a mixed imaging sequence for MR imaging characterization of human breast disease.

Authors:  T E Merchant; G R Thelissen; P W de Graaf; C W Nieuwenhuizen; H C Kievit; W Den Otter
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  An anthropomorphic phantom for quantitative evaluation of breast MRI.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Jacco A de Zwart; Jennifer T Loud; Riham H El Khouli; Kyle J Myers; Mark H Greene; Jeff H Duyn; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  11 in total

1.  Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE-MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Mathilde Wagner; Lori L Arlinghaus; Madhava P Aryal; Yue Cao; Thomas L Chenevert; Fiona Fennessy; Wei Huang; Nola M Hylton; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Kathryn E Keenan; Dariya I Malyarenko; Robert V Mulkern; David C Newitt; Stephen E Russek; Karl F Stupic; Alina Tudorica; Lisa J Wilmes; Thomas E Yankeelov; Yi-Fei Yen; Michael A Boss; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Variability in Quantitative DCE-MRI: Sources and Solutions.

Authors:  Harrison Kim
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2018

3.  Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Joshua R Biller; Jana G Delfino; Michael A Boss; Mark D Does; Jeffrey L Evelhoch; Mark A Griswold; Jeffrey L Gunter; R Scott Hinks; Stuart W Hoffman; Geena Kim; Riccardo Lattanzi; Xiaojuan Li; Luca Marinelli; Gregory J Metzger; Pratik Mukherjee; Robert J Nordstrom; Adele P Peskin; Elena Perez; Stephen E Russek; Berkman Sahiner; Natalie Serkova; Amita Shukla-Dave; Michael Steckner; Karl F Stupic; Lisa J Wilmes; Holden H Wu; Huiming Zhang; Edward F Jackson; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Variability and bias assessment in breast ADC measurement across multiple systems.

Authors:  Kathryn E Keenan; Adele P Peskin; Lisa J Wilmes; Sheye O Aliu; Ella F Jones; Wen Li; John Kornak; David C Newitt; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A Comparison of Methods for High-Spatial-Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Jessica A McKay; An L Church; Nathan Rubin; Tim H Emory; Noelle F Hoven; Jessica E Kuehn-Hajder; Michael T Nelson; Sudhir Ramanna; Edward J Auerbach; Steen Moeller; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Temperature and concentration calibration of aqueous polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) solutions for isotropic diffusion MRI phantoms.

Authors:  Friedrich Wagner; Frederik B Laun; Tristan A Kuder; Anna Mlynarska; Florian Maier; Jonas Faust; Kerstin Demberg; Linus Lindemann; Boris Rivkin; Armin M Nagel; Mark E Ladd; Klaus Maier-Hein; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Michael Bach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  QIN Benchmarks for Clinical Translation of Quantitative Imaging Tools.

Authors:  Keyvan Farahani; Darrell Tata; Robert J Nordstrom
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2019-03

8.  Improving the image quality of DWI in breast cancer: comparison of multi-shot DWI using multiplexed sensitivity encoding to conventional single-shot echo-planar imaging DWI.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Baxter; Andrew J Patterson; Ramona Woitek; Iris Allajbeu; Martin J Graves; Fiona Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Influence of residual fat signal on diffusion kurtosis MRI of suspicious mammography findings.

Authors:  Anna Mlynarska-Bujny; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Frederik Bernd Laun; Franziska König; Wolfgang Lederer; Heidi Daniel; Mark Edward Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Stefan Delorme; Tristan Anselm Kuder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Variability and Standardization of Quantitative Imaging: Monoparametric to Multiparametric Quantification, Radiomics, and Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Shohei Fujita; Yoshiharu Ohno; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 10.065

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.