BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the interaction between the local mechanical environment and fracture healing are not known. We developed a mouse femoral fracture model with implants of different stiffness, and hypothesized that differential fracture healing would result. METHODS: Femoral shaft fractures were created in 70 mice, and were treated with an intramedullary nail made of either tungsten (Young's modulus = 410 GPa) or aluminium (Young's modulus = 70 GPa). Mice were then sacrificed at 2 or 5 weeks. Fracture calluses were analyzed using standard microCT, histological, and biomechanical methods. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, callus volume was significantly greater in the aluminium group than in the tungsten group (61.2 vs. 40.5 mm(3), p = 0.016), yet bone volume within the calluses was no different between the groups (13.2 vs. 12.3 mm(3)). Calluses from the tungsten group were stiffer on mechanical testing (18.7 vs. 9.7 N/mm, p = 0.01). The percent cartilage in the callus was 31.6% in the aluminium group and 22.9% in the tungsten group (p = 0.40). At 5 weeks, there were no differences between any of the healed femora. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, fracture implants of different stiffness led to different fracture healing in this mouse fracture model. Fractures treated with a stiffer implant had more advanced healing at 2 weeks, but still healed by callus formation. Although this concept has been well documented previously, this particular model could be a valuable research tool to study the healing consequences of altered fixation stiffness, which may provide insight into the pathogenesis and ideal treatment of fractures and non-unions.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the interaction between the local mechanical environment and fracture healing are not known. We developed a mouse femoral fracture model with implants of different stiffness, and hypothesized that differential fracture healing would result. METHODS: Femoral shaft fractures were created in 70 mice, and were treated with an intramedullary nail made of either tungsten (Young's modulus = 410 GPa) or aluminium (Young's modulus = 70 GPa). Mice were then sacrificed at 2 or 5 weeks. Fracture calluses were analyzed using standard microCT, histological, and biomechanical methods. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, callus volume was significantly greater in the aluminium group than in the tungsten group (61.2 vs. 40.5 mm(3), p = 0.016), yet bone volume within the calluses was no different between the groups (13.2 vs. 12.3 mm(3)). Calluses from the tungsten group were stiffer on mechanical testing (18.7 vs. 9.7 N/mm, p = 0.01). The percent cartilage in the callus was 31.6% in the aluminium group and 22.9% in the tungsten group (p = 0.40). At 5 weeks, there were no differences between any of the healed femora. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, fracture implants of different stiffness led to different fracture healing in this mouse fracture model. Fractures treated with a stiffer implant had more advanced healing at 2 weeks, but still healed by callus formation. Although this concept has been well documented previously, this particular model could be a valuable research tool to study the healing consequences of altered fixation stiffness, which may provide insight into the pathogenesis and ideal treatment of fractures and non-unions.
Authors: Jasmin Lienau; Hanna Schell; Georg N Duda; Petra Seebeck; Sarah Muchow; Hermann J Bail Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: J H Holstein; P Garcia; T Histing; A Kristen; C Scheuer; M D Menger; T Pohlemann Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Stacy H Shomento; Chao Wan; Xuemei Cao; Marie-Claude Faugere; Mary L Bouxsein; Thomas L Clemens; Ryan C Riddle Journal: J Cell Biochem Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 4.429
Authors: Chao Liu; Robert Carrera; Vittoria Flamini; Lena Kenny; Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Benson M George; Daniel Hunter; Bo Liu; Gurpreet Singh; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Mann; Jill A Helms; Alesha B Castillo Journal: Bone Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Zachary J Gunderson; Zachery R Campbell; Todd O McKinley; Roman M Natoli; Melissa A Kacena Journal: Injury Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Jennifer A McKenzie; Evan Buettmann; Adam C Abraham; Michael J Gardner; Matthew J Silva; Megan L Killian Journal: FASEB J Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Katherine R Hixon; Jennifer A McKenzie; David A W Sykes; Susumu Yoneda; Austin Hensley; Evan G Buettmann; Hongjun Zheng; Dimitrios Skouteris; Audrey McAlinden; Anna N Miller; Matthew J Silva Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 6.741