Literature DB >> 32362447

A comprehensive review of mouse diaphyseal femur fracture models.

Zachary J Gunderson1, Zachery R Campbell1, Todd O McKinley1, Roman M Natoli1, Melissa A Kacena2.   

Abstract

Complications related to treatment of long bone fractures still stand as a major challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Elucidation of the mechanisms of bone healing and development, and the subsequent alteration of these mechanisms to improve outcomes, typically requires animal models as an intermediary between in vitro and human clinical studies. Murine models are some of the most commonly used in translational research, and mouse fracture models are particularly diverse, offering a wide variety of customization with distinct benefits and limitations depending on the study. This review critically examines three common femur fracture models in the mouse, namely cortical hole, 3-point fracture (Einhorn), and segmental bone defect. We lay out the general procedure for execution of each model, evaluate the practical implications and important advantages/disadvantages of each and describe recent innovations. Furthermore, we explore the applications that each model is best adapted for in the context of the current state of murine orthopaedic research.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Bone healing; Defect; Fracture; Mouse; Segmental defect

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32362447      PMCID: PMC7323889          DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  76 in total

1.  Fracture healing in mice under controlled rigid and flexible conditions using an adjustable external fixator.

Authors:  Viktoria Röntgen; Robert Blakytny; Romano Matthys; Mario Landauer; Tim Wehner; Melanie Göckelmann; Philipp Jermendy; Michael Amling; Thorsten Schinke; Lutz Claes; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Runx1 dose-dependently regulates endochondral ossification during skeletal development and fracture healing.

Authors:  Do Y Soung; Laleh Talebian; Christina J Matheny; Rosa Guzzo; Maren E Speck; Jay R Lieberman; Nancy A Speck; Hicham Drissi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Biological effects of rAAV-caAlk2 coating on structural allograft healing.

Authors:  Mette Koefoed; Hiromu Ito; Kirill Gromov; David G Reynolds; Hani A Awad; Paul T Rubery; Michael Ulrich-Vinther; Kjeld Soballe; Robert E Guldberg; Angela S P Lin; Regis J O'Keefe; Xinping Zhang; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Distribution of bone marrow-derived cells in the fracture callus during plate fixation in a green fluorescent protein-chimeric mouse model.

Authors:  Masaki Ueno; Kentaro Uchida; Masashi Takaso; Hiroaki Minehara; Kaori Suto; Naonobu Takahira; Roland Steck; Michael A Schuetz; Moritoshi Itoman
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2011

5.  Generation of closed transverse fractures in small animals.

Authors:  Anthony De Giacomo; Elise F Morgan; Louis C Gerstenfeld
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  The Generation of Closed Femoral Fractures in Mice: A Model to Study Bone Healing.

Authors:  Justin N Williams; Yong Li; Anuradha Valiya Kambrath; Uma Sankar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Teriparatide therapy enhances devitalized femoral allograft osseointegration and biomechanics in a murine model.

Authors:  David G Reynolds; Masahiko Takahata; Amy L Lerner; Regis J O'Keefe; Edward M Schwarz; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Development of a reliable non-union model in mice.

Authors:  Patric Garcia; Jörg H Holstein; Sabrina Maier; Hagen Schaumlöffel; Fuad Al-Marrawi; Matthias Hannig; Tim Pohlemann; Michael D Menger
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  A single percutaneous injection of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 accelerates fracture repair.

Authors:  Thomas A Einhorn; Robert J Majeska; Ahamed Mohaideen; Eric M Kagel; Mary L Bouxsein; Thomas J Turek; John M Wozney
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Effect of antibiotic infused calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite (CAS/HA) insets on implant-associated osteitis in a femur fracture model in mice.

Authors:  Lisa Oezel; Carina Büren; Armin O Scholz; Joachim Windolf; Ceylan D Windolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Low bone mass and impaired fracture healing in mouse models of Trisomy21 (Down syndrome).

Authors:  Kirby M Sherman; Diarra K Williams; Casey A Welsh; Alexis M Cooper; Alyssa Falck; Shannon Huggins; Rihana S Bokhari; Dana Gaddy; Kent D McKelvey; Lindsay A Dawson; Larry J Suva
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.626

Review 2.  Magnesium-based materials in orthopaedics: material properties and animal models.

Authors:  Xirui Jing; Qiuyue Ding; Qinxue Wu; Weijie Su; Keda Yu; Yanlin Su; Bing Ye; Qing Gao; Tingfang Sun; Xiaodong Guo
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-09-28

3.  Mouse Digit Tip Regeneration Is Mechanical Load Dependent.

Authors:  Connor P Dolan; Felisha Imholt; Tae-Jung Yang; Rihana Bokhari; Joshua Gregory; Mingquan Yan; Osama Qureshi; Katherine Zimmel; Kirby M Sherman; Alyssa Falck; Ling Yu; Eric Leininger; Regina Brunauer; Larry J Suva; Dana Gaddy; Lindsay A Dawson; Ken Muneoka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.390

4.  Validation of the modified radiographic union score for tibia fractures (mRUST) in murine femoral fractures.

Authors:  Vincent J Alentado; Adam M Knox; Caio A Staut; Anthony C McGuire; Joseph R Chitwood; Sarah L Mostardo; Mustufa Z Shaikh; Rachel J Blosser; Usashi C Dadwal; Tien-Min Gabriel Chu; Christopher D Collier; Jiliang Li; Ziyue Liu; Melissa A Kacena; Roman M Natoli
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.055

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.