Literature DB >> 21443424

Estimating the lowest detectable dose of ionizing radiation by FISH whole-chromosome painting.

James D Tucker1, Leo S Luckinbill.   

Abstract

Chromosome translocations are the hallmark of exposure to ionizing radiation, but they also occur spontaneously, and their frequencies increase dramatically with age. This complicates dosimetry unless a pre-exposure sample is available for each putatively exposed individual. Here we use published values for translocations in unexposed subjects from a wide range of ages, together with data from an in vitro (137)Cs dose-response curve, to estimate the minimum dose of whole-body radiation that is detectable by translocation analyses in individuals of a given age. For subjects aged 20 to 69 years, we show that the minimum detectable acute dose increases linearly with age at a rate of 0.179, 0.218 and 0.256 cGy per year for significance levels of P  =  0.05, P  =  0.01 and P  =  0.001, respectively. For chronic exposures, the corresponding minimum detectable doses are 1.591, 2.270 and 3.055 cGy per year. For newborns, the 95th and 99th percentiles of translocation frequencies are 0.20 and 0.31 per 100 cell equivalents, respectively, indicating that values greater than these are consistent with exposures at P  =  0.05 and P  =  0.01, respectively. These results improve our understanding of the requirements and limitations for performing biological dosimetry when only the age of the exposed individual is known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21443424     DOI: 10.1667/RR2506.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  7 in total

Review 1.  Deoxyribonucleic acid damage-associated biomarkers of ionising radiation: current status and future relevance for radiology and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Manning; K Rothkamm
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Authors:  Miles J McKenna; Erin Robinson; Lynn Taylor; Christopher Tompkins; Michael N Cornforth; Steven L Simon; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  LONG-TERM BIODOSIMETRY REDUX.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Comparison between two FISH techniques in the in vitro study of cytogenetic markers for low-dose X-ray exposure in human primary fibroblasts.

Authors:  D Nieri; F Berardinelli; A Antoccia; C Tanzarella; Antonella Sgura
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Dose-response curves for analyzing of dicentric chromosomes and chromosome translocations following doses of 1000 mGy or less, based on irradiated peripheral blood samples from five healthy individuals.

Authors:  Yu Abe; Mitsuaki A Yoshida; Kurumi Fujioka; Yumiko Kurosu; Risa Ujiie; Aki Yanagi; Naohiro Tsuyama; Tomisato Miura; Toshiya Inaba; Kenji Kamiya; Akira Sakai
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.