Literature DB >> 27412511

LONG-TERM BIODOSIMETRY REDUX.

Steven L Simon1, André Bouville2.   

Abstract

This paper revisits and reiterates the needs, purposes and requirements of biodosimetric assays for long-term dose and health risk assessments. While the most crucial need for biodosimetric assays is to guide medical response for radiation accidents, the value of such techniques for improving our understanding of radiation health risk by supporting epidemiological (long-term health risk) studies is significant. As new cohorts of exposed persons are identified and new health risk studies are undertaken with the hopes that studying the exposed will result in a deeper understanding of radiation risk, the value of reliable dose reconstruction is underscored. The ultimate application of biodosimetry in long-term health risk studies would be to completely replace model-based dose reconstruction-a complex suite of methods for retrospectively estimating dose that is commonly fraught with large uncertainties due to the absence of important exposure-related information, as well as imperfect models. While biodosimetry could potentially supplant model-based doses, there are numerous limitations of presently available techniques that constrain their widespread application in health risk research, including limited ability to assess doses received far in the past, high cost, great inter-individual variability, invasiveness, higher than preferred detection limits and the inability to assess internal dose (for the most part). These limitations prevent the extensive application of biodosimetry to large cohorts and should be considered a challenge to researchers to develop new and more flexible techniques that meet the demands of long-term health risk research. Events in recent years, e.g. the Fukushima reactor accident and the increased threat of nuclear terrorism, underscore that any event that results in significant radiation exposures of a group of people will also produce a much larger population, exposed at lower levels, but that likewise needs (or demands) an exposure assessment. Hence, the needs for retrospective dose estimation are likely to be greater in the future. The value of biodosimetry can be considerably enhanced with the development of new or improved methods, particularly with suitability for application at long periods of time after exposure. Published by Oxford University Press 2016. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27412511      PMCID: PMC5225978          DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  5 in total

1.  Parameters affecting EPR dose reconstruction in teeth.

Authors:  A A Romanyukha; D A Schauer; J A Thomas; D F Regulla
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Estimating the lowest detectable dose of ionizing radiation by FISH whole-chromosome painting.

Authors:  James D Tucker; Leo S Luckinbill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Current use and future needs of biodosimetry in studies of long-term health risk following radiation exposure.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Ruth Kleinerman
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Radiation-exposed populations: who, why, and how to study.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Thyroid Cancer Detection by Ultrasound Among Residents Ages 18 Years and Younger in Fukushima, Japan: 2011 to 2014.

Authors:  Toshihide Tsuda; Akiko Tokinobu; Eiji Yamamoto; Etsuji Suzuki
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.822

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Authors:  Miles J McKenna; Erin Robinson; Lynn Taylor; Christopher Tompkins; Michael N Cornforth; Steven L Simon; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Identification of Potential Biomarkers of Radiation Exposure in Blood Cells by Capillary Electrophoresis Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Lue Sun; Yohei Inaba; Norie Kanzaki; Mahesh Bekal; Koichi Chida; Takashi Moritake
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.