Literature DB >> 30714852

Chromosome Translocations, Inversions and Telomere Length for Retrospective Biodosimetry on Exposed U.S. Atomic Veterans.

Miles J McKenna1,2,3, Erin Robinson3, Lynn Taylor2, Christopher Tompkins3, Michael N Cornforth1,4, Steven L Simon5, Susan M Bailey1,2,3.   

Abstract

It has now been over 60 years since U.S. nuclear testing was conducted in the Pacific islands and Nevada, exposing military personnel to varying levels of ionizing radiation. Actual doses are not well-established, as film badges in the 1950s had many limitations. We sought a means of independently assessing dose for comparison with historical film badge records and dose reconstruction conducted in parallel. For the purpose of quantitative retrospective biodosimetry, peripheral blood samples from 12 exposed veterans and 12 age-matched (>80 years) veteran controls were collected and evaluated for radiation-induced chromosome damage utilizing directional genomic hybridization (dGH), a cytogenomics-based methodology that facilitates simultaneous detection of translocations and inversions. Standard calibration curves were constructed from six male volunteers in their mid-20s to reflect the age range of the veterans at time of exposure. Doses were estimated for each veteran using translocation and inversion rates independently; however, combining them by a weighted-average generally improved the accuracy of dose estimations. Various confounding factors were also evaluated for potential effects on chromosome aberration frequencies. Perhaps not surprisingly, smoking and age-associated increases in background frequencies of inversions were observed. Telomere length was also measured, and inverse relationships with both age and combined weighted dose estimates were observed. Interestingly, smokers in the non-exposed control veteran cohort displayed similar telomere lengths as those in the never-smoker exposed veteran group, suggesting that chronic smoking had as much effect on telomere length as a single exposure to radioactive fallout. Taken together, we find that our approach of combined chromosome aberration-based retrospective biodosimetry provided reliable dose estimation capability, particularly on a group average basis, for exposures above statistical detection limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30714852      PMCID: PMC6492561          DOI: 10.1667/RR15240.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  45 in total

1.  Translocation analysis by the FISH-painting method for retrospective dose reconstruction in individuals exposed to ionizing radiation 10 years after exposure.

Authors:  Marjori L Camparoto; Adriana T Ramalho; Adayapalam T Natarajan; Maria P Curado; Elza T Sakamoto-Hojo
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Persistence of chromosome aberrations following acute radiation: I, PAINT translocations, dicentrics, rings, fragments, and insertions.

Authors:  James D Tucker; Jackie Cofield; Kyomu Matsumoto; Marilyn J Ramsey; D Carl Freeman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Biodosimetry for a radiation worker using multiple assays.

Authors:  T Straume; J N Lucas; J D Tucker; W L Bigbee; R G Langlois
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.316

4.  Chromosomal analysis to assess radiation dose.

Authors:  D C Lloyd
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Telomere dysfunction impairs DNA repair and enhances sensitivity to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  K K Wong; S Chang; S R Weiler; S Ganesan; J Chaudhuri; C Zhu; S E Artandi; K L Rudolph; G J Gottlieb; L Chin; F W Alt; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Telomeres, lifestyle, cancer, and aging.

Authors:  Masood A Shammas
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Comparison of established and emerging biodosimetry assays.

Authors:  K Rothkamm; C Beinke; H Romm; C Badie; Y Balagurunathan; S Barnard; N Bernard; H Boulay-Greene; M Brengues; A De Amicis; S De Sanctis; R Greither; F Herodin; A Jones; S Kabacik; T Knie; U Kulka; F Lista; P Martigne; A Missel; J Moquet; U Oestreicher; A Peinnequin; T Poyot; U Roessler; H Scherthan; B Terbrueggen; H Thierens; M Valente; A Vral; F Zenhausern; V Meineke; H Braselmann; M Abend
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  The association between physical activity in leisure time and leukocyte telomere length.

Authors:  Lynn F Cherkas; Janice L Hunkin; Bernet S Kato; J Brent Richards; Jeffrey P Gardner; Gabriela L Surdulescu; Masayuki Kimura; Xiaobin Lu; Tim D Spector; Abraham Aviv
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-28

9.  Directional genomic hybridization for chromosomal inversion discovery and detection.

Authors:  F Andrew Ray; Erin Zimmerman; Bruce Robinson; Michael N Cornforth; Joel S Bedford; Edwin H Goodwin; Susan M Bailey
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Telomere length in Chernobyl accident recovery workers in the late period after the disaster.

Authors:  Jelena Reste; Gunda Zvigule; Tija Zvagule; Natalja Kurjane; Maija Eglite; Natalija Gabruseva; Dace Berzina; Juris Plonis; Edvins Miklasevics
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.724

View more
  3 in total

1.  Accounting for overdispersion of lethal lesions in the linear quadratic model improves performance at both high and low radiation doses.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Dose Estimation for Exposure to Radioactive Fallout from Nuclear Detonations.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; André Bouville; Harold L Beck; Lynn R Anspaugh; Kathleen M Thiessen; F Owen Hoffman; Sergey Shinkarev
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 3.  Chromatin and the Cellular Response to Particle Radiation-Induced Oxidative and Clustered DNA Damage.

Authors:  John M Danforth; Luc Provencher; Aaron A Goodarzi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.