Literature DB >> 19395527

Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: how much do learned associations matter?

Ian C Fiebelkorn1, John J Foxe, Sophie Molholm.   

Abstract

The spread of attention-related processing across anatomically separated cortical regions plays an important role in the binding of an object's features, both within and across sensory modalities. We presented multiple exemplars of semantically congruent multisensory objects (e.g., dogs with barks) and semantically incongruent multisensory objects (e.g., guitars with barks) while recording high-density event-related potentials and tested whether highly learned associations among the multisensory features of well-known objects modulated the spread of attention from an attended visual stimulus to its paired, task-irrelevant sound. Our findings distinguish dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: 1) a stimulus-driven spread of attention that occurs whenever a task-irrelevant sound is simultaneously presented with an attended visual stimulus, independent of highly learned associations, and 2) a representation-driven spread of attention that occurs in response to a task-irrelevant sound that is semantically congruent with a visual target and is therefore dependent on highly learned associations. The first mechanism is thought to reflect bottom-up feature binding, whereas the second mechanism is thought to reflect the top-down activation of a stored object representation that includes the well-known object's multisensory features. When a semantically congruent, task-irrelevant sound is simultaneously presented with a well-known visual target, the combined spread of attention through both mechanisms appears additive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19395527      PMCID: PMC2792190          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  40 in total

1.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.

Authors:  J J McDonald; W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Tracking an object through feature space.

Authors:  E Blaser; Z W Pylyshyn; A O Holcombe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas.

Authors:  Thomas W James; G Keith Humphrey; Joseph S Gati; Philip Servos; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Intra-modal and cross-modal spatial attention to auditory and visual stimuli. An event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  W A Teder-Sälejärvi; T F Münte; F Sperlich; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

Review 6.  Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration?

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Tracy J Doty; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Visual-auditory events: cross-modal perceptual priming and recognition memory.

Authors:  A J Greene; R D Easton; L S LaShell
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2001-09

9.  Nonspatial intermodal selective attention is mediated by sensory brain areas: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  D Talsma; A Kok
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Sophie Molholm; Walter Ritter; Micah M Murray; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06
View more
  32 in total

1.  The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Kenneth C Roberts; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Throwing out the rules: anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Jeremy W Murphy; Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Visual attention is not enough: Individual differences in statistical word-referent learning in infants.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Chen Yu
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013-01

5.  Searching for audiovisual correspondence in multiple speaker scenarios.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Daniele Romano; Angelo Maravita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Durk Talsma; Daniel Senkowski; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Pitting binding against selection--electrophysiological measures of feature-based attention are attenuated by Gestalt object grouping.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Ready, set, reset: stimulus-locked periodicity in behavioral performance demonstrates the consequences of cross-sensory phase reset.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; John S Butler; Manuel R Mercier; Adam C Snyder; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Clustering of heading selectivity and perception-related activity in the ventral intraparietal area.

Authors:  Mengmeng Shao; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki; Aihua Chen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.