Literature DB >> 21427321

Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients.

Lawrence T Dauer1, Raymond H Thornton, Jennifer L Hay, Rochelle Balter, Matthew J Williamson, Jean St Germain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As public awareness of medical radiation exposure increases, there has been heightened awareness among patients and physicians of the importance of holistic benefit-and-risk discussions in shared medical decision making.
CONCLUSION: We examine the rationale for informed consent and risk communication, draw on the literature on the psychology of radiation risk communication to increase understanding, examine methods commonly used to communicate radiation risk, and suggest strategies for improving communication about medical radiation benefits and risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21427321      PMCID: PMC3816522          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  39 in total

1.  Is computed tomography safe?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of natural background dose rates for residents of the Amargosa Valley, NV, to those in Leadville, CO, and the states of Colorado and Nevada.

Authors:  Dade W Moeller; Lin-Shen C Sun
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 3.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

5.  Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.

Authors:  Joachim Breckow
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Issues in medical exposures.

Authors:  Alex Elliott
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery.

Authors:  A Lloyd; P Hayes; P R Bell; A R Naylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Utilization guidelines for reducing radiation exposure in the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A practice quality improvement project.

Authors:  Michael L Loftus; Shlomo Minkowitz; A John Tsiouris; Robert J Min; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Radiophobia: long-term psychological consequences of Chernobyl.

Authors:  Ross H Pastel
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Counter-Point: are we really ordering too many CT scans?

Authors:  David T Schwartz
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05
View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Communicating radiation risk to patients and referring physicians in the emergency department setting.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Shyu; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prevalence and Correlates of Worry About the Health Harms of Medical Imaging Radiation in the General Population.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Geoffrey S Gold; Raymond E Baser; Hedvig Hricak; Lawrence T Dauer
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-05-09

Review 4.  Radiation exposure from radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: concerns and solutions.

Authors:  Reza Fazel; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know.

Authors:  Leila Ukkola; Heljä Oikarinen; Anja Henner; Hilkka Honkanen; Marianne Haapea; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Imaging Radiation Doses and Associated Risks and Benefits in Subjects Participating in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fresco; Gonzalo Spera; Carlos Meyer; Pablo Cabral; John R Mackey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Awareness of Medical Doctors in Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia on Diagnostic Radiological Examination Related Radiation Exposure in the Pediatric Population.

Authors:  Chee Guan Ng; Hanani Abdul Manan; Faizah Mohd Zaki; Rozman Zakaria
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 8.  Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development.

Authors:  Stephen S Yoo; Timothy J Jorgensen; Ann R Kennedy; John D Boice; Alla Shapiro; Tom C-C Hu; Brian R Moyer; Marcy B Grace; Gary J Kelloff; Michael Fenech; Pataje G S Prasanna; C Norman Coleman
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  Capturing treatment decision making among patients with solid tumors and their caregivers.

Authors:  Randy A Jones; Richard Steeves; Mary E Ropka; Patricia Hollen
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Parental preferences on diagnostic imaging tests for paediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Claudia Martinez-Rios; Jennifer R McKinney; Nadine Al-Aswad; Arvind K Shergill; Ada F Louffat; Lillian Sung; Karen E Thomas; Suzanne Schuh; George Tomlinson; Rahim Moineddin; Andrea S Doria
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.