Literature DB >> 24727460

Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development.

Stephen S Yoo1, Timothy J Jorgensen, Ann R Kennedy, John D Boice, Alla Shapiro, Tom C-C Hu, Brian R Moyer, Marcy B Grace, Gary J Kelloff, Michael Fenech, Pataje G S Prasanna, C Norman Coleman.   

Abstract

The United States radiation medical countermeasures (MCM) programme for radiological and nuclear incidents has been focusing on developing mitigators for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE), and biodosimetry technologies to provide radiation dose assessments for guiding treatment. Because a nuclear accident or terrorist incident could potentially expose a large number of people to low to moderate doses of ionising radiation, and thus increase their excess lifetime cancer risk, there is an interest in developing mitigators for this purpose. This article discusses the current status, issues, and challenges regarding development of mitigators against radiation-induced cancers. The challenges of developing mitigators for ARS include: the long latency between exposure and cancer manifestation, limitations of animal models, potential side effects of the mitigator itself, potential need for long-term use, the complexity of human trials to demonstrate effectiveness, and statistical power constraints for measuring health risks (and reduction of health risks after mitigation) following relatively low radiation doses (<0.75 Gy). Nevertheless, progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms resulting in radiation injury, along with parallel progress in dose assessment technologies, make this an opportune, if not critical, time to invest in research strategies that result in the development of agents to lower the risk of radiation-induced cancers for populations that survive a significant radiation exposure incident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24727460      PMCID: PMC7668684          DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/34/2/R25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  153 in total

1.  Micronucleus frequency in human lymphocytes is related to plasma vitamin B12 and homocysteine.

Authors:  M Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-07-16       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 2.  The Genome Health Clinic and Genome Health Nutrigenomics concepts: diagnosis and nutritional treatment of genome and epigenome damage on an individual basis.

Authors:  Michael Fenech
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  The risks and benefits of 5α-reductase inhibitors for prostate-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Marc R Theoret; Yang-Min Ning; Jenny J Zhang; Robert Justice; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Psychogenic stress induces chromosomal and DNA damage.

Authors:  H K Fischman; R W Pero; D D Kelly
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.292

5.  Fukushima: Fallout of fear.

Authors:  Geoff Brumfiel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 14, 1950-2003: an overview of cancer and noncancer diseases.

Authors:  Kotaro Ozasa; Yukiko Shimizu; Akihiko Suyama; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Midori Soda; Eric J Grant; Ritsu Sakata; Hiromi Sugiyama; Kazunori Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Protection against late effects of radiation by S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)-ethylphosphorothioic acid.

Authors:  D J Grdina; B A Carnes; D Grahn; C P Sigdestad
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Chemopreventive agents: protease inhibitors.

Authors:  A R Kennedy
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.310

9.  Effect of N-acetyl cysteine on oxidative DNA damage and the frequency of DNA deletions in atm-deficient mice.

Authors:  Ramune Reliene; Elvira Fischer; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected?

Authors:  P Jacob; W Rühm; L Walsh; M Blettner; G Hammer; H Zeeb
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Radiation Stress Response: Of the People, By the People and For the People.

Authors:  C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening.

Authors:  Hongxiang Mu; Jing Sun; Linwei Li; Jie Yin; Nan Hu; Weichao Zhao; Dexin Ding; Lan Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Defined Sensing Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways Contribute to the Global Inflammatory Gene Expression Output Elicited by Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Prabhat K Purbey; Philip O Scumpia; Peter J Kim; Ann-Jay Tong; Keisuke S Iwamoto; William H McBride; Stephen T Smale
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 4.  Addressing the Symptoms or Fixing the Problem? Developing Countermeasures against Normal Tissue Radiation Injury.

Authors:  Jacqueline P Williams; Laura Calvi; Joe V Chakkalakal; Jacob N Finkelstein; M Kerry O'Banion; Edward Puzas
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Biomarkers of Ionizing Radiation Exposure: A Multiparametric Approach.

Authors:  Dimphy Zeegers; Shriram Venkatesan; Shu Wen Koh; Grace Kah Mun Low; Pallavee Srivastava; Neisha Sundaram; Swaminathan Sethu; Birendranath Banerjee; Manikandan Jayapal; Oleg Belyakov; Rajamanickam Baskar; Adayabalam S Balajee; M Prakash Hande
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2017-01-23

6.  Medical countermeasures for radiation induced health effects: report of an Interagency Panel Session held at the NASA Human Research Program Investigator's Workshop, 26 January 2017.

Authors:  Lisa S Carnell; Mary Homer; Keith Hoots; Heather Meeks; Pataje G S Prasanna; Carmen Rios; Lisa C Simonsen; Lanyn P Taliaferro; Lynne K Wathen
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.694

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.