Literature DB >> 27056688

Modified fixations for distal femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and clinical relevance study.

Shih-Hao Chen1, Ching-Lung Tai2,3, Tzai-Chiu Yu1, Chih-Wei Wang1, Chia-Wei Lin1, Chen-Yu Chen4, Keng-Chang Liu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Distal femur fractures adjacent to total knee arthroplasty are a rare yet complex problem. Recently, extramedullary locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail fixations have become popular options, but the complication rates associated with these procedures are 15-20 %. Modified fixations were assessed in an effort to reduce complications from unstable periprosthetic fractures.
METHODS: Using experimental and finite element methods, this study compared the construct behaviours of a locking plate, a retrograde intramedullary nail, and their modifications (a spiral-blade supplemented in an intramedullary nail or a locking plate/allograft hybrid) when subjected to various fracture types, locations, loading conditions, and bony strength. The implanted models were used to assess construct stiffness, fracture micromotion, and implant stress under different osteoporotic conditions. Finally, we collected 40 cases for radiological analysis to indicate the appropriate procedure for treating periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty.
RESULTS: Regardless of the fracture type, femoral constructs fixed with a conventional or spiral-blade supplemented intramedullary nail exhibited higher axial but lower torsional stiffness than those fixed with a locking plate. Torsional deformation occurred if the lower-positioned fracture had no medial support. The locking plate/allograft construct exhibited the highest stiffness and the least micromotion. A review of 40 clinical cases confirmed the above findings regarding the locking plate/allograft construct.
CONCLUSION: The spiral-blade supplement of retrograde intramedullary nail and locking plate/allograft modified constructs significantly stabilizes the unstable fractured gaps. The locking plate/allograft is recommended for the periprosthetic fractures with deficient bone stock and severe osteoporosis to improve alignment and healing potentials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Locking plate; Periprosthetic distal femur fracture; Retrograde intramedullary nail; Spiral-blade

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27056688     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4107-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods.

Authors:  Peter L Althausen; Mark A Lee; Christopher G Finkemeier; John P Meehan; Juan J Rodrigo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  2010 mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures.

Authors:  Christopher E Henderson; Trevor J Lujan; Lori L Kuhl; Michael Bottlang; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; John L Marsh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Are extreme distal periprosthetic supracondylar fractures of the femur too distal to fix using a lateral locked plate?

Authors:  P N Streubel; M J Gardner; S Morshed; C A Collinge; B Gallagher; W M Ricci
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-04

4.  Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases.

Authors:  M Schütz; M Müller; C Krettek; D Höntzsch; P Regazzoni; R Ganz; N Haas
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Improved intramedullary nail interlocking in osteoporotic bone.

Authors:  K Ito; R Hungerbühler; D Wahl; R Grass
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Intramedullary nailing versus locked plate for treating supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  John G Horneff; John A Scolaro; S Mehdi Jafari; Amer Mirza; Javad Parvizi; Samir Mehta
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 7.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements.

Authors:  Edward T Su; Hargovind DeWal; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 8.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty. A literature review and treatment algorithm.

Authors:  A M DiGioia; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Distal femoral replacement in periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S S Jassim; I McNamara; P Hopgood
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Biomechanical analysis of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation in distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Chih-Han Chang; Yuan-Chiao Lu
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty for severe knee osteoarthritis accompanying extra-articular femoral deformity: the results are promising.

Authors:  B Demir; B Özkul; M S Saygılı; E Çetinkaya; D Akbulut
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.