| Literature DB >> 21423719 |
Elizabeth K Speliotes1, Laura M Yerges-Armstrong, Jun Wu, Ruben Hernaez, Lauren J Kim, Cameron D Palmer, Vilmundur Gudnason, Gudny Eiriksdottir, Melissa E Garcia, Lenore J Launer, Michael A Nalls, Jeanne M Clark, Braxton D Mitchell, Alan R Shuldiner, Johannah L Butler, Marta Tomas, Udo Hoffmann, Shih-Jen Hwang, Joseph M Massaro, Christopher J O'Donnell, Dushyant V Sahani, Veikko Salomaa, Eric E Schadt, Stephen M Schwartz, David S Siscovick, Benjamin F Voight, J Jeffrey Carr, Mary F Feitosa, Tamara B Harris, Caroline S Fox, Albert V Smith, W H Linda Kao, Joel N Hirschhorn, Ingrid B Borecki.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) clusters in families, but the only known common genetic variants influencing risk are near PNPLA3. We sought to identify additional genetic variants influencing NAFLD using genome-wide association (GWA) analysis of computed tomography (CT) measured hepatic steatosis, a non-invasive measure of NAFLD, in large population based samples. Using variance components methods, we show that CT hepatic steatosis is heritable (∼26%-27%) in family-based Amish, Family Heart, and Framingham Heart Studies (n = 880 to 3,070). By carrying out a fixed-effects meta-analysis of genome-wide association (GWA) results between CT hepatic steatosis and ∼2.4 million imputed or genotyped SNPs in 7,176 individuals from the Old Order Amish, Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik study (AGES), Family Heart, and Framingham Heart Studies, we identify variants associated at genome-wide significant levels (p<5×10(-8)) in or near PNPLA3, NCAN, and PPP1R3B. We genotype these and 42 other top CT hepatic steatosis-associated SNPs in 592 subjects with biopsy-proven NAFLD from the NASH Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN). In comparisons with 1,405 healthy controls from the Myocardial Genetics Consortium (MIGen), we observe significant associations with histologic NAFLD at variants in or near NCAN, GCKR, LYPLAL1, and PNPLA3, but not PPP1R3B. Variants at these five loci exhibit distinct patterns of association with serum lipids, as well as glycemic and anthropometric traits. We identify common genetic variants influencing CT-assessed steatosis and risk of NAFLD. Hepatic steatosis associated variants are not uniformly associated with NASH/fibrosis or result in abnormalities in serum lipids or glycemic and anthropometric traits, suggesting genetic heterogeneity in the pathways influencing these traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21423719 PMCID: PMC3053321 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
Figure 1Study design.
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data was performed in Stage 1 across the cohorts shown. SNPs representing the best associating loci were genotyped in histology based NAFLD samples (Stage 2) from the NASH CRN matched to genome wide genotyped and imputed MIGen controls. The effects of the five NAFLD associated SNPs on NASH CRN/iCONT, metabolic phenotypes and eQTLs in liver and adipose tissue were then performed (Stage 3).
Characterization of family data for heritability estimation.
| Study | N | N families | Design | Age range (years) | Heritability | SE |
| Amish | 880 | 1 | founder population participants link to a single, 14-generation pedigree | 29–94 | 0.27 | 0.08 |
| Family Heart Study | 2679 | 508 | 3-generational pedigrees | 32–83 | 0.27 | 0.04 |
| Framingham Heart Study | 3070 | 721 | 2-generational pedigrees | 31–83 | 0.26 | 0.04 |
N: total number of individuals with fatty liver phenotype; SE: Standard error; For all studies, SOLAR software was used to estimate heritability [47].
Genome-wide significant or replicating variants from GOLD, NASH CRN/MIGen, and metabolic phenotype analyses.
| Locus | GOLD Meta-analysis | NASH CRN/MIGen analysis | Metabolic Phenotypes Meta Analyses | Dir. | ||||||||||||||
| n = 7,176 | n = 592/1,405 | n = 93,996–99,900 | n = 35,478–46,182 | |||||||||||||||
| SNP ID | Chr. | Pos. | Nearest | EA | EAF | Effect | % Var | GOLD | EAF | EAF | ORNAFLD | NAFLD | LDL | HDL | TG | Glucose | HOMA-IR | |
| (Mb) | Gene | (SE) | P | (95% CI) | P | P | P | P | ||||||||||
| rs738409 | 22 | 42656060 | G | 0.23 | 0.26 | 2.41 | 4.30E-34 | 0.49 | 0.23 | 3.26 | 3.60E-43 | 1.41E-02 | 6.19E-03 | 2.21E-01 | 0.1867 | 0.1384 | ++NNNNN | |
| 0.02 | (2.11–7.21) | |||||||||||||||||
| rs2228603 | 19 | 19190924 | T | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.79 | 1.22E-11 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.65 | 5.29E-05 | 1.42E-19 | 6.78E-01 | 1.49E-23 | 0.3934 | 0.2329 | ++-N-NN | |
| 0.03 | (1.15–2.87) | |||||||||||||||||
| rs12137855 | 1 | 217515001 | C | 0.79 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 1.06E-04 | 0.83 | 0.79 | 1.37 | 4.12E-05 | 8.71E-02 | 1.47E-01 | 7.34E-01 | 0.9815 | 0.4694 | ++NNNNN | |
| 0.02 | (1.17–1.57) | |||||||||||||||||
| rs780094 | 2 | 27594741 | T | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 2.56E-04 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 1.45 | 2.59E-08 | 4.37E-04 | 3.96E-02 | 7.08E-125 | 2.49E-12 | 7.626E-07 | +++N+— | |
| 0.02 | (1.19–1.86) | |||||||||||||||||
| rs4240624 | 8 | 9221641 | A | 0.92 | 0.29 | 1.18 | 3.68E-18 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 2.85E-01 | 1.27E-12 | 1.44E-23 | 1.94E-02 | 7.83E-06 | 0.001657 | +N++N-N | |
| 0.03 | (0.68–1.18) | |||||||||||||||||
GOLD: Genetics of Obesity-related Liver Disease; NASH CRN: Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network; MIGen: Myocardial Infarction Genetics Consortium;
**from The Global Lipids Genetics, GIANT, MAGIC, and DIAGRAM Consortia; Chr. Chromosome; Pos.: position, build 35; Mb: Megabase; EA: effect allele; EAF: Effect allele frequency; Effect: increase in inverse normalized fatty liver by computed tomography SE: Standard Error;% Var- percentage of variance explained; GOLD P: p-value of association in GOLD;
EAFa: Frequency of the effect allele in cases from the NASH CRN study;
EAFb: Frequency of the effect allele in controls from the MIGen study; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; ORNAFLD: odds ratio for the presence of NAFLD on pathology per effect allele; NAFLD P: False discovery rate p-value of association for histologic NAFLD; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; Glucose: fasting glucose; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; P: p-value of association; Dir: direction of effect allele for significant associations in GOLD, NASH CRN/MIGen, LDL, HDL, TG, glucose, HOMA-IR analyses respectively; +/− represents increasing/decreasing fatty liver in GOLD, and having a higher/lower odds of having NAFLD in the NASH CRN/MIGen analyses and higher/lower LDL, HDL, TG, glucose, HOMA-IR respectively; N represents no significant effect; PNPLA3: patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, HGNC: 18590); NCAN: neurocan (HGNC: 2465); LYPLAL1: lysophospholipase-like 1 (HGNC: 20440); GCKR: glucokinase regulatory protein (HGNC: 4196); PPP1R3B: protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 3b (HGNC: 14942).
Figure 2Genome-wide association results for GOLD (Stage 1).
A. Manhattan plot showing the significance of association of all SNPs in the Stage 1 GOLD meta-analysis with CT hepatic steatosis. SNPs are plotted on the x-axis according to their position on each chromosome against association with CT hepatic steatosis on the y-axis (shown as -log10 p-value). SNPs that also associate with histology based NAFLD are in red, those that only associate with CT hepatic steatosis in blue. B. Quantile-quantile plot of SNPs after Stage 1 GOLD meta-analysis (black) and after removing any SNPs within 500 kb of PNPLA3, PPP1R3B, and NCAN (red).
Figure 3Regional plots of genome-wide significant or replicating loci of association in GOLD.
SNPs are plotted by position on chromosome against association with CT hepatic steatosis (–log10 p-value). The figures highlight the SNP taken into Stage 2 (diamond). The SNPs surrounding the most significant SNP are color-coded to reflect their LD with this SNP as in the inset (taken from pairwise R2 values from the HapMap CEU database, www.hapmap.org). Estimated recombination rates (from HapMap) are plotted in cyan to reflect the local LD structure. Genes and the direction of transcription, are noted below the plots (data from UCSC genome browser, genome.ucsc.edu). Coding SNPs in high LD with the best SNP are noted with rs number and protein change.
Figure 4Effects on traits.
Direction of effect on CT fatty liver, histology NAFLD, lipid and glycemic traits of the best associating SNPs at the loci shown. Direction is shown only for significant associations. CT: CT hepatic steatosis; LDL: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; HOMA-IR: homeostatic model of insulin resistance; PNPLA3: patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (HGNC: 18590); NCAN: neurocan (HGNC: 2465); LYPLAL1: lysophospholipase-like 1 (HGNC: 20440); GCKR: glucokinase regulatory protein (HGNC: 4196); PPP1R3B: protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 3b (HGNC: 14942).