Literature DB >> 15599315

Noninvasive evaluation of graft steatosis in living donor liver transplantation.

Minoru Iwasaki1, Yasutsugu Takada, Michihiro Hayashi, Sachiko Minamiguchi, Hironori Haga, Yoji Maetani, Kazuhiro Fujii, Tetsuya Kiuchi, Koichi Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hepatic steatosis affects graft function as well as postoperative recovery of donors in living donor liver transplantation. Liver macrovesicular steatosis in living donors was assessed using quantitative X-ray computed tomography (CT) analysis and histological examination of intraoperative liver biopsy.
METHODS: A total of 266 living donors with complete pretransplant CT data and intraoperative "time 0" biopsy were included in the study. Liver biopsy specimen obtained during donor operation was examined for macrovesicular steatosis and was classified as none; mild (<30%); moderate (30%-60%); or severe (>60%). Liver-to-spleen CT attenuation values ratio (L/S ratio) on noncontrast-CT was evaluated for its usefulness as an index of hepatic steatosis in comparison with other parameters including body mass index (BMI) and serum liver function tests (gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, cholinesterase, and total cholesterol) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS.: Histological grade of macrovesicular steatosis was none in 198 patients (74.4%), mild in 50 (18.8%), moderate in 15 (5.7%), and severe in 3 (1.1%). The median L/S ratios for the respective histological grades were 1.20 (range: 1.00-1.46), 1.12 (0.83-1.37), 1.01 (0.74-1.21), and 0.90 (0.70-0.99) (P<0.0001). The ROC curve for L/S ratio was located closest to the upper left corner, and the area under the curve of L/S ratio was significantly larger than that of any other preoperative variables.
CONCLUSION: L/S ratio calculated from preoperative CT can be a useful tool to discriminate hepatic macrovesicular steatosis. Based on the present results, the optimal cut-off value for L/S ratio to exclude more than moderate steatosis would be 1.1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15599315     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000140499.23683.0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  47 in total

1.  Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Biesterfeld; Jasmin Knapp; Fernando Bittinger; Heiko Götte; Martin Schramm; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Liver regeneration in donors evaluated by Tc-99m-GSA scintigraphy after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Masaki Kaibori; Sang Kil Ha-Kawa; Yoichiro Uchida; Morihiko Ishizaki; Takamichi Saito; Kosuke Matsui; Junko Hirohara; Koichi Tanaka; Yasuo Kamiyama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Fatty liver is associated with dyslipidemia and dysglycemia independent of visceral fat: the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Speliotes; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Ramachandran S Vasan; James B Meigs; Dushyant V Sahani; Joel N Hirschhorn; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  CT indices for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis using non-enhanced CT images: development and validation of diagnostic cut-off values in a large cohort with pathological reference standard.

Authors:  Jieun Byun; Seung Soo Lee; Yu Sub Sung; Youngbin Shin; Jessica Yun; Ho Sung Kim; Eun Sil Yu; Sung-Gyu Lee; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Younger Age is an Independent Factor for Graft Weight Overestimation: Analysis of the Clinical Impact on Recipient Outcomes in 340 Japanese Living Liver Donors.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Toshimi Kaido; Tetsuya Tajima; Tadahiro Uemura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Andrea Schenk; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Assessment of liver fat in an obese patient population using noncontrast CT fat percent index.

Authors:  Ali F Jon; Ahmad R Cheema; Atif N Khan; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Thomas Hauser; Imad Nasser; Francine K Welty; Andrew Karellas; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Abdominal Visceral Adipose Tissue is Associated with Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COPD.

Authors:  Alejandro A Diaz; Tom P Young; Sila Kurugol; Erick Eckbo; Nina Muralidhar; Joshua K Chapman; Gregory L Kinney; James C Ross; Raul San Jose Estepar; Rola Harmouche; Jennifer L Black-Shinn; Matthew Budoff; Russell P Bowler; John Hokanson; George R Washko
Journal:  Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis       Date:  2015

8.  Liver fat is reproducibly measured using computed tomography in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Speliotes; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Meredith C Foster; Dushyant V Sahani; Joel N Hirschhorn; Christopher J O'Donnell; Caroline S Fox
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  The Morbidity and Comorbidity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Different Glucose Intolerance Strata in a Community-Based Chinese Population.

Authors:  Xiuying Zhang; Xianghai Zhou; Xueyao Han; Zuodi Fu; Lianying Wang; Yufeng Li; Linong Ji
Journal:  Metab Syndr Relat Disord       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  Imaging evaluation of the liver using multi-detector row computed tomography in micropigs as potential living liver donors.

Authors:  Jung Min Ryu; Dong Hyun Kim; Min Young Lee; Sang Hun Lee; Jae Hong Park; Seung Pil Yun; Min Woo Jang; Seong Hwan Kim; Gyu Jin Rho; Ho Jae Han
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.