Literature DB >> 14695401

Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living related liver donors: correlation between CT and histologic findings.

Piyaporn Limanond1, Steven S Raman, Charles Lassman, James Sayre, R Mark Ghobrial, Ronald W Busuttil, Sammy Saab, David S K Lu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess degree of macrovesicular steatosis with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and correlate it with histologic findings in potential donors for living related liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two candidates underwent unenhanced CT within 4 weeks of core liver biopsy. An experienced liver pathologist, blinded to both CT and surgical findings, retrospectively reviewed biopsy specimens and determined degree of macrovesicular steatosis. A radiologist blinded to histologic grading calculated mean hepatic attenuation in each donor liver by averaging 25 region-of-interest (ROI) measurements on five sections (five ROIs per section). Mean splenic attenuation was calculated with three separate ROI measurements. Liver attenuation index (LAI) was derived and defined as the difference between mean hepatic and mean splenic attenuation. Body mass index (BMI) was determined for each patient. Linear regression analysis was used to correlate degree of macrovesicular steatosis with both LAI and BMI.
RESULTS: LAI correctly predicted degree of macrovesicular steatosis in 38 (90%) of 42 cases. In four of four livers, LAI below -10 HU correlated with greater than 30% macrovesicular steatosis (unacceptable for liver transplantation). In nine of 11 livers, LAI was between -10 and 5 HU and correctly predicted 6%-30% steatosis (relative contraindication). In two of 11 cases, LAI overestimated degree of hepatic steatosis. LAI above 5 HU correctly predicted 0%-5% steatosis in 25 of 27 livers. In two of 27 cases, parenchymal hemosiderin deposition led to an increase in LAI into the normal range, despite mild histologically confirmed steatosis. Degree of histologic macrovesicular steatosis correlated well with LAI (r = 0.92) and marginally with BMI (r = 0.45). Of 27 potential donors with normal livers at CT and acceptable LAI levels, four (15%) were deemed poor donor candidates because core biopsy revealed subtle hepatic necrosis and nonspecific hepatitis.
CONCLUSION: Although unenhanced CT quantifies the degree of macrovesicular steatosis relatively well, it may preclude a liver biopsy only in a small percentage of potential donors with low LAI (unacceptable degree of steatosis). Core liver biopsy is still necessary in the majority of donors with normal LAI to identify those with both fatty liver and coexistent hemosiderin deposition or radiologically occult diffuse liver diseases. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14695401     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2301021176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  81 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative Assessment of Liver Fat with Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Irene Cruite; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography of the liver: can fat deposition in the liver affect the measurement of liver stiffness?

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Yoshibumi Niitsuma; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Quantification of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment.

Authors:  Stefan Biesterfeld; Jasmin Knapp; Fernando Bittinger; Heiko Götte; Martin Schramm; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Hepatic fat quantification magnetic resonance for monitoring treatment response in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Hong Koh; Seung Kim; Myung-Joon Kim; Hyun Gi Kim; Hyun Joo Shin; Mi-Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance are important factors in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Yuichiro Eguchi; Takahisa Eguchi; Toshihiko Mizuta; Yasushi Ide; Tsutomu Yasutake; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Akitaka Hisatomi; Iwata Ozaki; Kyousuke Yamamoto; Yoichiro Kitajima; Yasunori Kawaguchi; Shigetaka Kuroki; Naofumi Ono
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Evolution of donor morbidity in living related liver transplantation: a single-center analysis of 165 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Broering; Christian Wilms; Pamela Bok; Lutz Fischer; Lars Mueller; Christian Hillert; Christian Lenk; Jong-Sun Kim; Martina Sterneck; Karl-Heinz Schulz; Gerrit Krupski; Axel Nierhaus; Detlef Ameis; Martin Burdelski; Xavier Rogiers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Evaluation of diffuse liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging: which modality is best?

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Daryl M Chen; Richard S Breiman; Antonio C Westphalen; Benjamin M Yeh; Kirk D Jones; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley; Peter W Callen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 9.  Importance of imaging and recent developments in diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Mustafa Koplay; Mesut Sivri; Hasan Erdogan; Alaaddin Nayman
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-04-18

10.  Assessment of liver fat in an obese patient population using noncontrast CT fat percent index.

Authors:  Ali F Jon; Ahmad R Cheema; Atif N Khan; Vassilios Raptopoulos; Thomas Hauser; Imad Nasser; Francine K Welty; Andrew Karellas; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.