Literature DB >> 18173506

Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves.

P W Hedrick1, R J Fredrickson.   

Abstract

Mexican and red wolves were both faced with extinction in the wild until captive populations were established more than two decades ago. These captive populations have been successfully managed genetically to minimize mean kinship and retain genetic variation. Descendants of these animals were subsequently used to start reintroduced populations, which now number about 40-50 Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico and about 100 red wolves in North Carolina. The original captive Mexican wolf population was descended from three founders. Merging this lineage with two other captive lineages, each with two founders, has been successfully carried out in the captive population and is in progress in the reintroduced population. This effort has resulted in increased fitness of cross-lineage wolves, or genetic rescue, in both the captive and reintroduced populations. A number of coyote-red wolf hybrid litters were observed in the late 1990s in the reintroduced red wolf population. Intensive identification and management efforts appear to have resulted in the elimination of this threat. However, population reintroductions of both Mexican and red wolves appear to have reached numbers well below the generally recommended number for recovery and there is no current effort to re-establish other populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18173506     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03400.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  19 in total

1.  Genetics and wolf conservation in the American West: lessons and challenges.

Authors:  R Wayne; P Hedrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves.

Authors:  Richard J Fredrickson; Peter Siminski; Melissa Woolf; Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Morten Ravn Knudsen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  A genome-wide perspective on the evolutionary history of enigmatic wolf-like canids.

Authors:  Bridgett M vonHoldt; John P Pollinger; Dent A Earl; James C Knowles; Adam R Boyko; Heidi Parker; Eli Geffen; Malgorzata Pilot; Wlodzimierz Jedrzejewski; Bogumila Jedrzejewska; Vadim Sidorovich; Claudia Greco; Ettore Randi; Marco Musiani; Roland Kays; Carlos D Bustamante; Elaine A Ostrander; John Novembre; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  The efficiency of close inbreeding to reduce genetic adaptation to captivity.

Authors:  K Theodorou; D Couvet
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Genome-Wide Analysis of SNPs Is Consistent with No Domestic Dog Ancestry in the Endangered Mexican Wolf (Canis lupus baileyi).

Authors:  Robert R Fitak; Sarah E Rinkevich; Melanie Culver
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Identification of recent hybridization between gray wolves and domesticated dogs by SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Bridgett M vonHoldt; John P Pollinger; Dent A Earl; Heidi G Parker; Elaine A Ostrander; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Genetic variability and structure of jaguar (Panthera onca) in Mexican zoos.

Authors:  Pilar Rueda-Zozaya; Germán D Mendoza-Martínez; Daniel Martínez-Gómez; Octavio Monroy-Vilchis; José Antonio Godoy; Armando Sunny; Francisco Palomares; Cuauhtémoc Chávez; José Herrera-Haro
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Offspring survival changes over generations of captive breeding.

Authors:  Katherine A Farquharson; Carolyn J Hogg; Catherine E Grueber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) markers in conservation biology.

Authors:  Beata Ujvari; Katherine Belov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.