Literature DB >> 19780974

Efficiency of selection, as measured by single nucleotide polymorphism variation, is dependent on inbreeding rate in Drosophila melanogaster.

Ditte Demontis1, Cino Pertoldi, Volker Loeschcke, Karina Mikkelsen, Tomas Axelsson, Torsten Nygaard Kristensen.   

Abstract

It is often hypothesized that slow inbreeding causes less inbreeding depression than fast inbreeding at the same absolute level of inbreeding. Possible explanations for this phenomenon include the more efficient purging of deleterious alleles and more efficient selection for heterozygote individuals during slow, when compared with fast, inbreeding. We studied the impact of inbreeding rate on the loss of heterozygosity and on morphological traits in Drosophila melanogaster. We analysed five noninbred control lines, 10 fast inbred lines and 10 slow inbred lines; the inbred lines all had an expected inbreeding coefficient of approximately 0.25. Forty single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA coding regions were genotyped, and we measured the size and shape of wings and counted the number of sternopleural bristles on the genotyped individuals. We found a significantly higher level of genetic variation in the slow inbred lines than in the fast inbred lines. This higher genetic variation was resulting from a large contribution from a few loci and a smaller effect from several loci. We attributed the increased heterozygosity in the slow inbred lines to the favouring of heterozygous individuals over homozygous individuals by natural selection, either by associative over-dominance or balancing selection, or a combination of both. Furthermore, we found a significant polynomial correlation between genetic variance and wing size and shape in the fast inbred lines. This was caused by a greater number of homozygous individuals among the fast inbred lines with small, narrow wings, which indicated inbreeding depression. Our results demonstrated that the same amount of inbreeding can have different effects on genetic variance depending on the inbreeding rate, with slow inbreeding leading to higher genetic variance than fast inbreeding. These results increase our understanding of the genetic basis of the common observation that slow inbred lines express less inbreeding depression than fast inbred lines. In addition, this has more general implications for the importance of selection in maintaining genetic variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19780974     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04366.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  13 in total

1.  Slow inbred lines of Drosophila melanogaster express as much inbreeding depression as fast inbred lines under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Torsten Nygaard Kristensen; Morten Ravn Knudsen; Volker Loeschcke
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Selection signatures in melanocortin-1 receptor gene of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) raised in hot humid tropics.

Authors:  S O Durosaro; B M Ilori; O S Iyasere; O G George; O A Adewumi; P A Ojo; T A Yusuff; M R Adetifa; T S Atanda; M O Ozoje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Origin and evolution of sulfadoxine resistant Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Sumiti Vinayak; Md Tauqeer Alam; Tonya Mixson-Hayden; Andrea M McCollum; Rithy Sem; Naman K Shah; Pharath Lim; Sinuon Muth; William O Rogers; Thierry Fandeur; John W Barnwell; Ananias A Escalante; Chansuda Wongsrichanalai; Frederick Ariey; Steven R Meshnick; Venkatachalam Udhayakumar
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Consistent scaling of inbreeding depression in space and time in a house sparrow metapopulation.

Authors:  Alina K Niskanen; Anna M Billing; Håkon Holand; Ingerid J Hagen; Yimen G Araya-Ajoy; Arild Husby; Bernt Rønning; Ane Marlene Myhre; Peter Sjolte Ranke; Thomas Kvalnes; Henrik Pärn; Thor Harald Ringsby; Sigbjørn Lien; Bernt-Erik Sæther; Stefanie Muff; Henrik Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Applications and implications of neutral versus non-neutral markers in molecular ecology.

Authors:  Heather Kirk; Joanna R Freeland
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Comparative transcriptome of wild type and selected strains of the microalgae Tisochrysis lutea provides insights into the genetic basis, lipid metabolism and the life cycle.

Authors:  Gregory Carrier; Matthieu Garnier; Loïc Le Cunff; Gaël Bougaran; Ian Probert; Colomban De Vargas; Erwan Corre; Jean-Paul Cadoret; Bruno Saint-Jean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Kari Nissinen; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Island survivors: population genetic structure and demography of the critically endangered giant lizard of La Gomera, Gallotia bravoana.

Authors:  Elena G Gonzalez; Ivania Cerón-Souza; José A Mateo; Rafael Zardoya
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Inbreeding rate modifies the dynamics of genetic load in small populations.

Authors:  Nina Pekkala; K Emily Knott; Janne S Kotiaho; Mikael Puurtinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Diego Bersabé; Armando Caballero; Andrés Pérez-Figueroa; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.