Literature DB >> 12904490

Neuromotor noise limits motor performance, but not motor adaptation, in children.

Craig D Takahashi1, Dan Nemet, Christie M Rose-Gottron, Jennifer K Larson, Dan M Cooper, David J Reinkensmeyer.   

Abstract

Children do not typically appear to move with the same skill and dexterity as adults, although they can still improve their motor performance in specific tasks with practice. One possible explanation is that their motor performance is limited by an inherently higher level of movement variability, but that their motor adaptive ability is robust to this variability. To test this hypothesis, we examined motor adaptation of 43 children (ages 6-17) and 12 adults as they reached while holding the tip of a lightweight robot. The robot applied either a predictable, velocity-dependent field (the "mean field") or a similar field that incorporated stochastic variation (the "noise field"), thereby further enhancing the variability of the subjects' movements. We found that children exhibited greater initial trial-to-trial variability in their unperturbed movements but were still able to adapt comparably to adults in both the mean and noise fields. Furthermore, the youngest children (ages 6-8) were able to reduce their variability with practice to levels comparable to the remaining children groups although not as low as adults. These results indicate that children as young as age 6 possess adult-like neural systems for motor adaptation and internal model formation that allow them to adapt to novel dynamic environments as well as adults on average despite increased neuromotor or environmental noise. Performance after adaptation is still more variable than adults, however, indicating that movement inconsistency, not motor adaptation inability, ultimately limits motor performance by children and may thus account for their appearance of incoordination and more frequent motor accidents (e.g., spilling, tripping). The results of this study also suggest that movement variability in young children may arise from two sources--a relatively constant, intrinsic source related to fundamental physiological constraints of the developing motor system and a more rapidly modifiable source that is modulated depending on the current motor context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904490     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01173.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  26 in total

1.  Development of internal models and predictive abilities for visual tracking during childhood.

Authors:  Caroline Ego; Demet Yüksel; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor adaptation to a small force field superimposed on a large background force.

Authors:  Jiayin Liu; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Leg muscle recruitment during cycling is less developed in triathletes than cyclists despite matched cycling training loads.

Authors:  Andrew R Chapman; Bill Vicenzino; Peter Blanch; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Older adults learn less, but still reduce metabolic cost, during motor adaptation.

Authors:  Helen J Huang; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Susanne M Morton; Jaynie F Yang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

7.  Nonword repetition in children and adults: effects on movement coordination.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Anne Smith; Neeraja Sadagopan; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-05

8.  Age-related differences in the motor planning of a lower leg target matching task.

Authors:  Brenda L Davies; James E Gehringer; Max J Kurz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  High-gain visual feedback exacerbates ankle movement variability in children.

Authors:  Hwasil Moon; Changki Kim; MinHyuk Kwon; Yen-Ting Chen; Emily Fox; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Timothy Hunter; Paul Sacco; Michael A Nitsche; Duncan L Turner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.