Literature DB >> 12724098

Development of force adaptation during childhood.

Jürgen Konczak1, Petra Jansen-Osmann, Karl-Theodor Kalveram.   

Abstract

Humans learn to make reaching movements in novel dynamic environments by acquiring an internal motor model of their limb dynamics. Here, the authors investigated how 4- to 11-year-old children (N = 39) and adults (N = 7) adapted to changes in arm dynamics, and they examined whether those data support the view that the human brain acquires inverse dynamics models (IDM) during development. While external damping forces were applied, the children learned to perform goal-directed forearm flexion movements. After changes in damping, all children showed kinematic aftereffects indicative of a neural controller that still attempted to compensate the no longer existing damping force. With increasing age, the number of trials toward complete adaptation decreased. When damping was present, forearm paths were most perturbed and most variable in the youngest children but were improved in the older children. The findings indicate that the neural representations of limb dynamics are less precise in children and less stable in time than those of adults. Such controller instability might be a primary cause of the high kinematic variability observed in many motor tasks during childhood. Finally, the young children were not able to update those models at the same rate as the older children, who, in turn, adapted more slowly than adults. In conclusion, the ability to adapt to unknown forces is a developmental achievement. The present results are consistent with the view that the acquisition and modification of internal models of the limb dynamics form the basis of that adaptive process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12724098     DOI: 10.1080/00222890309602120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral palsy: new approaches to therapy.

Authors:  Marjorie A Garvey; Margot L Giannetti; Katharine E Alter; Peter S Lum
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Susanne M Morton; Jaynie F Yang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Development of interactions between sensorimotor representations in school-aged children.

Authors:  Florian A Kagerer; Jane E Clark
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Robot-aided developmental assessment of wrist proprioception in children.

Authors:  Francesca Marini; Valentina Squeri; Pietro Morasso; Claudio Campus; Jürgen Konczak; Lorenzo Masia
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Electrophysiological and hemodynamic evidence for late maturation of hand power grip and force control under visual feedback.

Authors:  Pascal Halder; Silvia Brem; Kerstin Bucher; Said Boujraf; Paul Summers; Thomas Dietrich; Spyros Kollias; Ernst Martin; Daniel Brandeis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Motor adaptation to different dynamic environments is facilitated by indicative context stimuli.

Authors:  Stefanie Richter; Petra Jansen-Osmann; Jürgen Konczak; Karl-Theodor Kalveram
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-27

7.  Focal dystonia in musicians: linking motor symptoms to somatosensory dysfunction.

Authors:  Jürgen Konczak; Giovanni Abbruzzese
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Motor learning in childhood reveals distinct mechanisms for memory retention and re-learning.

Authors:  Kristin E Musselman; Ryan T Roemmich; Ben Garrett; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Major changes in a rhythmic ball-bouncing task occur at age 7 years.

Authors:  Christophe Bazile; Isabelle A Siegler; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Developmental Perspective in Learning the Mirror-Drawing Task.

Authors:  Mona Sharon Julius; Esther Adi-Japha
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.