Literature DB >> 21403381

Fifty years of brain tissue mechanical testing: from in vitro to in vivo investigations.

Simon Chatelin1, André Constantinesco, Rémy Willinger.   

Abstract

Beginning in the 1960s many studies have been performed to investigate the mechanical properties of brain. In this paper we point out the difficulties linked with in vitro experimental protocols as well as the advantages of using recently developed non-invasive in vivo techniques, such as magnetic resonance elastography. Results of in vitro and in vivo work are compared, emphasizing the specificities and disparities of the in vitro as well as the in vivo results. In particular, a detailed discussion of the results obtained from dynamic shear experiments and magnetic resonance elastography is given before arriving at a tentative conclusion on the state of knowledge of the mechanical properties of brain.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21403381     DOI: 10.3233/BIR-2010-0576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biorheology        ISSN: 0006-355X            Impact factor:   1.875


  79 in total

1.  Transmission, attenuation and reflection of shear waves in the human brain.

Authors:  Erik H Clayton; Guy M Genin; Philip V Bayly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Myosin IIA suppresses glioblastoma development in a mechanically sensitive manner.

Authors:  Hannah S Picariello; Rajappa S Kenchappa; Vandana Rai; James F Crish; Athanassios Dovas; Katarzyna Pogoda; Mariah McMahon; Emily S Bell; Unnikrishnan Chandrasekharan; Amanda Luu; Rita West; Jan Lammerding; Peter Canoll; David J Odde; Paul A Janmey; Thomas Egelhoff; Steven S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reliable preparation of agarose phantoms for use in quantitative magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Grace McIlvain; Elahe Ganji; Catherine Cooper; Megan L Killian; Babatunde A Ogunnaike; Curtis L Johnson
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-05-03

4.  Compression stiffening of brain and its effect on mechanosensing by glioma cells.

Authors:  Katarzyna Pogoda; LiKang Chin; Penelope C Georges; FitzRoy J Byfield; Robert Bucki; Richard Kim; Michael Weaver; Rebecca G Wells; Cezary Marcinkiewicz; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.729

5.  Validation performance comparison for finite element models of the human brain.

Authors:  Logan E Miller; Jillian E Urban; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.763

6.  A simulation technique for 3D MR-guided acoustic radiation force imaging.

Authors:  Allison Payne; Josh de Bever; Alexis Farrer; Brittany Coats; Dennis L Parker; Douglas A Christensen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  In vivo modeling of interstitial pressure in a porcine model: approximation of poroelastic properties and effects of enhanced anatomical structure modeling.

Authors:  Saramati Narasimhan; Jared A Weis; Hernán F J González; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-12-06

8.  Mechanical properties of porcine brain tissue in vivo and ex vivo estimated by MR elastography.

Authors:  Charlotte A Guertler; Ruth J Okamoto; John L Schmidt; Andrew A Badachhape; Curtis L Johnson; Philip V Bayly
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Characterizing white matter tissue in large strain via asymmetric indentation and inverse finite element modeling.

Authors:  Yuan Feng; Chung-Hao Lee; Lining Sun; Songbai Ji; Xuefeng Zhao
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-09-16

10.  Long-term changes in the material properties of brain tissue at the implant-tissue interface.

Authors:  Arati Sridharan; Subramaniam D Rajan; Jit Muthuswamy
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.