| Literature DB >> 28701050 |
Logan E Miller1, Jillian E Urban1, Joel D Stitzel1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the performance of six validated brain finite element (FE) models to localized brain motion validation data in five experimental configurations. Model performance was measured using the objective metric CORA (CORrelation and Analysis), where higher ratings represent better correlation. The KTH model achieved the highest average CORA rating, and the ABM received the highest average rating among models robustly validated against five cadaver impacts in three directions. This technique can be more frequently employed to build better models and, when associated limitations are well understood, to compare inter-model performance under similar conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Brain model; CORA; finite element model; head injury; optimization; validation
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28701050 PMCID: PMC5975353 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1340462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin ISSN: 1025-5842 Impact factor: 1.763