Literature DB >> 30840744

In vivo modeling of interstitial pressure in a porcine model: approximation of poroelastic properties and effects of enhanced anatomical structure modeling.

Saramati Narasimhan1, Jared A Weis2, Hernán F J González1, Reid C Thompson3, Michael I Miga1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to test whether a poroelastic model with enhanced structure can capture in vivo interstitial pressure dynamics in a brain undergoing mock surgical loads. Using interstitial pressure data from a porcine study, we use an inverse model to reconstruct material properties in an effort to capture these in vivo brain tissue dynamics. Four distinct models for the reconstruction of parameters are investigated (full anatomical condition description, condition without dural septa description, condition without ventricle boundary description, and the conventional fully saturated model). These models are systematic in their development to isolate the influence of three model characteristics: the dural septa, the treatment of the ventricles, and the treatment of the brain as a saturated media. This study demonstrates that to capture appropriate pressure compartmentalization, interstitial pressure gradients, pressure transient effects, and deformations within the brain, the proposed boundary conditions and structural enhancement coupled with a heterogeneous description invoking partial saturation are needed in a biphasic poroelastic model. These findings suggest that with enhanced anatomical modeling and appropriate model assumptions, poroelastic models can be used to capture quite complex brain deformations and interstitial pressure dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; brain; computational modeling; finite element modeling; poroelastic; pressure gradient

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840744      PMCID: PMC6286300          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.045002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  36 in total

1.  In Vivo Analysis of Heterogeneous Brain Deformation Computations for Model-Updated Image Guidance.

Authors:  MICHAEL I. Miga; KEITH D. Paulsen; FRANCIS E. Kennedy; P. JACK Hoopes; ALEX Hartov; DAVID W. Roberts
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  In vivo modeling of interstitial pressure in the brain under surgical load using finite elements.

Authors:  M I Miga; K D Paulsen; P J Hoopes; F E Kennedy; A Hartov; D W Roberts
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Modeling of retraction and resection for intraoperative updating of images.

Authors:  M I Miga; D W Roberts; F E Kennedy; L A Platenik; A Hartov; K E Lunn; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Coupling of fluid and elastic models for biomechanical simulations of brain deformations using FEM.

Authors:  A Hagemann; K Rohr; H S Stiehl
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Interstitial pressure, volume, and flow during infusion into brain tissue.

Authors:  P J Basser
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.514

6.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation.

Authors:  Michael T Prange; Susan S Margulies
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Interhemispheric supratentorial intracranial pressure gradients in head-injured patients: are they clinically important?

Authors:  J Sahuquillo; M A Poca; M Arribas; A Garnacho; E Rubio
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Brain atlas deformation in the presence of small and large space-occupying tumors.

Authors:  B M Dawant; S L Hartmann; Shiyan Pan; S Gadamsetty
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2002

9.  Interhemispheric intracranial pressure gradients in massive cerebral infarction.

Authors:  J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Adnan I Qureshi; Anish Bhardwaj; Michael A Williams
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.956

10.  Interhemispheric intracranial pressure gradients in nonhuman primate stroke.

Authors:  Anthony L D'Ambrosio; Daniel J Hoh; William J Mack; Christopher J Winfree; M Nathan Nair; Andrew Ducruet; Robert R Sciacca; Judy Huang; David J Pinsky; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2002-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Biophysical model-based parameters to classify tumor recurrence from radiation-induced necrosis for brain metastases.

Authors:  Saramati Narasimhan; Haley B Johnson; Tanner M Nickles; Michael I Miga; Nitesh Rana; Albert Attia; Jared A Weis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Accounting for intraoperative brain shift ascribable to cavity collapse during intracranial tumor resection.

Authors:  Saramati Narasimhan; Jared A Weis; Ma Luo; Amber L Simpson; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  A hybrid, image-based and biomechanics-based registration approach to markerless intraoperative nodule localization during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Pablo Alvarez; Simon Rouzé; Michael I Miga; Yohan Payan; Jean-Louis Dillenseger; Matthieu Chabanas
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 13.828

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.