SUMMARY: In a population of elderly women, bone cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), femoral neck axis length (FNAL), and width measured with hip structure analysis (HSA) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images in the femoral neck and trochanteric regions are highly correlated to quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements. INTRODUCTION: HSA is a method of obtaining measurements of proximal femur structure using 2D DXA technology. This study was designed to examine the correlations between HSA measurements and 3D QCT. METHODS: Forty-one women (mean age, 82.8 ± 2.5 years) were measured using DXA and a 64-slice CT scanner (1 mm slice thickness, 0.29 mm in plane resolution). HSA parameters were calculated at the narrow neck (NN) and trochanteric (IT) regions on the DXA image. These regions were then translated to anatomically equivalent regions on the QCT dataset by co-registering the DXA image and QCT dataset using four DXA images acquired at different angles. RESULTS: At the NN and IT regions, high linear correlations were measured between HSA and QCT for CSA r = 0.95 and 0.93, CSMI r = 0.94 and 0.93, and Z r = 0.93 and 0.89, respectively. All correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001), but there were differences in slope and offset between the two techniques, at least in part due to differences in calibration between the two techniques. FNAL and width of the bone at the NN and IT regions, physical measurements independent of the calibration, were highly correlated (r = 0.90-0.95, p < 0.001) and had slopes close to 1.0 (range, 0.978 to 1.003). CONCLUSION: CSA, CSMI, Z, FNAL, and width measured by HSA correlate highly to high-resolution QCT.
SUMMARY: In a population of elderly women, bone cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), femoral neck axis length (FNAL), and width measured with hip structure analysis (HSA) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images in the femoral neck and trochanteric regions are highly correlated to quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements. INTRODUCTION:HSA is a method of obtaining measurements of proximal femur structure using 2D DXA technology. This study was designed to examine the correlations between HSA measurements and 3D QCT. METHODS: Forty-one women (mean age, 82.8 ± 2.5 years) were measured using DXA and a 64-slice CT scanner (1 mm slice thickness, 0.29 mm in plane resolution). HSA parameters were calculated at the narrow neck (NN) and trochanteric (IT) regions on the DXA image. These regions were then translated to anatomically equivalent regions on the QCT dataset by co-registering the DXA image and QCT dataset using four DXA images acquired at different angles. RESULTS: At the NN and IT regions, high linear correlations were measured between HSA and QCT for CSA r = 0.95 and 0.93, CSMI r = 0.94 and 0.93, and Z r = 0.93 and 0.89, respectively. All correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001), but there were differences in slope and offset between the two techniques, at least in part due to differences in calibration between the two techniques. FNAL and width of the bone at the NN and IT regions, physical measurements independent of the calibration, were highly correlated (r = 0.90-0.95, p < 0.001) and had slopes close to 1.0 (range, 0.978 to 1.003). CONCLUSION:CSA, CSMI, Z, FNAL, and width measured by HSA correlate highly to high-resolution QCT.
Authors: K Uusi-Rasi; T J Beck; L M Semanick; M M Daphtary; G G Crans; D Desaiah; K D Harper Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Benjamin C C Khoo; Scott G Wilson; Graeme K Worth; Ursula Perks; Emad Qweitin; Timothy D Spector; Roger I Price Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2009 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Sven Prevrhal; John A Shepherd; Kenneth G Faulkner; Ken W Gaither; Dennis M Black; Thomas F Lang Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Stephen Kaptoge; Thomas J Beck; Jonathan Reeve; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang Journal: Bone Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: M E Danielson; T J Beck; A S Karlamangla; G A Greendale; E J Atkinson; Y Lian; A S Khaled; T M Keaveny; D Kopperdahl; K Ruppert; S Greenspan; M Vuga; J A Cauley Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Melanie Schorr; Laura E Dichtel; Anu V Gerweck; Martin Torriani; Karen K Miller; Miriam A Bredella Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.199