Literature DB >> 21394495

An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT.

K Ramamurthi1, O Ahmad, K Engelke, R H Taylor, K Zhu, S Gustafsson, R L Prince, K E Wilson.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: In a population of elderly women, bone cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), section modulus (Z), femoral neck axis length (FNAL), and width measured with hip structure analysis (HSA) on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images in the femoral neck and trochanteric regions are highly correlated to quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements.
INTRODUCTION: HSA is a method of obtaining measurements of proximal femur structure using 2D DXA technology. This study was designed to examine the correlations between HSA measurements and 3D QCT.
METHODS: Forty-one women (mean age, 82.8 ± 2.5 years) were measured using DXA and a 64-slice CT scanner (1 mm slice thickness, 0.29 mm in plane resolution). HSA parameters were calculated at the narrow neck (NN) and trochanteric (IT) regions on the DXA image. These regions were then translated to anatomically equivalent regions on the QCT dataset by co-registering the DXA image and QCT dataset using four DXA images acquired at different angles.
RESULTS: At the NN and IT regions, high linear correlations were measured between HSA and QCT for CSA r = 0.95 and 0.93, CSMI r = 0.94 and 0.93, and Z r = 0.93 and 0.89, respectively. All correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001), but there were differences in slope and offset between the two techniques, at least in part due to differences in calibration between the two techniques. FNAL and width of the bone at the NN and IT regions, physical measurements independent of the calibration, were highly correlated (r = 0.90-0.95, p < 0.001) and had slopes close to 1.0 (range, 0.978 to 1.003).
CONCLUSION: CSA, CSMI, Z, FNAL, and width measured by HSA correlate highly to high-resolution QCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21394495      PMCID: PMC3261404          DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1578-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters.

Authors:  S Prevrhal; K Engelke; W A Kalender
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas Lang; Adrian LeBlanc; Harlan Evans; Ying Lu; Harry Genant; Alice Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Structural effects of raloxifene on the proximal femur: results from the multiple outcomes of raloxifene evaluation trial.

Authors:  K Uusi-Rasi; T J Beck; L M Semanick; M M Daphtary; G G Crans; D Desaiah; K D Harper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.

Authors:  M R Griffiths; K A Noakes; N A Pocock
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  A comparative study between corresponding structural geometric variables using 2 commonly implemented hip structural analysis algorithms applied to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images.

Authors:  Benjamin C C Khoo; Scott G Wilson; Graeme K Worth; Ursula Perks; Emad Qweitin; Timothy D Spector; Roger I Price
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Adaptation of the proximal femur to skeletal reloading after long-duration spaceflight.

Authors:  Thomas F Lang; Adrian D Leblanc; Harlan J Evans; Ying Lu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Comparison of DXA hip structural analysis with volumetric QCT.

Authors:  Sven Prevrhal; John A Shepherd; Kenneth G Faulkner; Ken W Gaither; Dennis M Black; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Thomas J Beck; Jonathan Reeve; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  25 in total

1.  Hip structural analysis in adolescent boys with anorexia nervosa and controls.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra; Debra K Katzman; Hannah Clarke; Deirdre Snelgrove; Kathryn Brigham; Karen K Miller; Anne Klibanski
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Differences in structural geometrical outcomes at the neck of the proximal femur using two-dimensional DXA-derived projection (APEX) and three-dimensional QCT-derived (BIT QCT) techniques.

Authors:  B C C Khoo; K Brown; K Zhu; M Pollock; K E Wilson; R I Price; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  MRI-based assessment of proximal femur strength compared to mechanical testing.

Authors:  Chamith S Rajapakse; Alexander R Farid; Daniel C Kargilis; Brandon C Jones; Jae S Lee; Alyssa J Johncola; Alexandra S Batzdorf; Snehal S Shetye; Michael W Hast; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  M E Danielson; T J Beck; A S Karlamangla; G A Greendale; E J Atkinson; Y Lian; A S Khaled; T M Keaveny; D Kopperdahl; K Ruppert; S Greenspan; M Vuga; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Body composition predictors of skeletal integrity in obesity.

Authors:  Melanie Schorr; Laura E Dichtel; Anu V Gerweck; Martin Torriani; Karen K Miller; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Managing osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis: something new?

Authors:  Luca Petruccio Piodi; Alessandro Poloni; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Impact of sleeve gastrectomy on hip structural analysis in adolescents and young adults with obesity.

Authors:  Madhusmita Misra; Abisayo Animashaun; Amita Bose; Vibha Singhal; Fatima Cody Stanford; Brian Carmine; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Hip structural analysis in adolescent and young adult oligoamenorrheic and eumenorrheic athletes and nonathletes.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Lisa Pierce; Gabriela Guereca; Meghan Slattery; Hang Lee; Mark Goldstein; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Hip structure analysis by DXA of teriparatide treatment: A 24-month follow-up clinical study.

Authors:  Takeshi Mochizuki; Koichiro Yano; Katsunori Ikari; Kosei Kawakami; Ryo Hiroshima; Naoko Koenuma; Mina Ishibashi; Toshikatsu Shirahata
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.