Literature DB >> 21391464

Comparison of three automated systems for urine chemistry and sediment analysis in routine laboratory practice.

Yasemin U Budak1, Kağan Huysal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urine analysis is an essential component of patient assessment, used in screening, diagnosis, and the planning of care. Automated urinalysis systems can save labor and time, and are valuable in high-volume laboratories. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of three automated urinalysis systems--Iris iQ200 (AX-4280), the Sysmex UF-1000i (Urisys 2400), and the UriSed LabUMat.
METHODS: A total of 412 urine samples sent for urinalysis were assessed using all three automated systems.
RESULTS: Correlation between the three instruments, represented as results within one grading unit showed an overall concordance level of more than 80% for chemical urinalysis systems. When we compared microscopy features, red blood cell detection correlation was best between the iQ200 and UriSed instruments (92%). The UF-1000i and iQ200 data on white blood and epithelial cell counts were optimally correlated (86% and 90%, respecttively).
CONCLUSIONS: The three automated urinalysis systems demonstrated acceptable correlations in chemical data between instruments. However, whereas the automated microscopy units could be used for initial screening, some manual microscopy was still necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21391464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  13 in total

1.  An End-to-End System for Automatic Urinary Particle Recognition with Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Yixiong Liang; Rui Kang; Chunyan Lian; Yuan Mao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Identification, Confirmation, and Replication of Novel Urinary MicroRNA Biomarkers in Lupus Nephritis and Diabetic Nephropathy.

Authors:  Mariana Cardenas-Gonzalez; Anand Srivastava; Mira Pavkovic; Vanesa Bijol; Helmut G Rennke; Isaac E Stillman; Xiaolan Zhang; Samir Parikh; Brad H Rovin; Maryam Afkarian; Ian H de Boer; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Sushrut S Waikar; Vishal S Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.

Authors:  Hatice Yüksel; Elif Kiliç; Aysun Ekinci; Osman Evliyaoğlu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  High False Positives and False Negatives in Yeast Parameter in an Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer.

Authors:  Ozgur Aydin; Hamit Yasar Ellidag; Esin Eren; Necat Yilmaz
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of Cobas 6500 and Iris IQ200 fully-automated urine analyzers to manual urine microscopy.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Nurinnisa Ozturk; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Elif Polat; Kadriye Akpinar; Emrullah Dorman; Harun Polat; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.

Authors:  Ebubekir Bakan; Zafer Bayraktutan; Nurcan Kilic Baygutalp; Mehmet Ali Gul; Fatma Zuhal Umudum; Nuri Bakan
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 7.  Progress in Automated Urinalysis.

Authors:  Matthijs Oyaert; Joris Delanghe
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Assessment of Interobserver Reliability of Nephrologist Examination of Urine Sediment.

Authors:  Ragnar Palsson; Mia R Colona; Melanie P Hoenig; Andrew L Lundquist; James E Novak; Mark A Perazella; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of uriSed automated urine microscopic sediment analyzer and dipstick parameters in predicting urine culture test results.

Authors:  Kağan Huysal; Yasemin U Budak; Ayse Ulusoy Karaca; Murat Aydos; Serdar Kahvecioğlu; Mehtap Bulut; Murat Polat
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.313

10.  The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.

Authors:  Fatma Demet İnce; Hamit Yaşar Ellidağ; Mehmet Koseoğlu; Neşe Şimşek; Hülya Yalçın; Mustafa Osman Zengin
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.