Literature DB >> 21385014

Auditory evoked response to gaps in noise: older adults.

Jennifer J Lister1, Nathan D Maxfield, Gabriel J Pitt, Victoria B Gonzalez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the auditory evoked response to silent gaps for a group of older adults using stimulus conditions identical to those used in psychophysical studies of gap detection.
DESIGN: The P1-N1-P2 response to the onsets of stimuli (markers) defining a silent gap for within-channel (spectrally identical markers) and across-channel (spectrally different markers) conditions was examined using four perceptually-equated gap durations. STUDY SAMPLE: A group of 24 older adults (mean age = 63 years) with normal hearing or minimal hearing loss participated.
RESULTS: Older adults exhibited neural activation patterns that were qualitatively different and more frontally oriented than those observed in a previous study (Lister et al., 2007) of younger listeners. Older adults showed longer P2 latencies and larger P1 amplitudes than younger adults, suggesting relatively slower neural travel time and altered auditory inhibition/arousal by irrelevant stimuli.
CONCLUSION: Older adults appeared to recruit later-occurring T-complex-like generators for gap processing, compared to earlier-occurring T-complex-like generators by the younger group. Early and continued processing of channel cues with later processing of gap cues may represent the inefficiency of the aging auditory system and may contribute to poor speech understanding in noisy, real-world listening environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21385014      PMCID: PMC4788511          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2010.526967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  38 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Linking brainwaves to the brain: an ERP primer.

Authors:  Alexandra P Fonaryova Key; Guy O Dove; Mandy J Maguire
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  The detection of temporal gaps as a function of frequency region and absolute noise bandwidth.

Authors:  D A Eddins; J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds.

Authors:  K L Tremblay; L Friesen; B A Martin; R Wright
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging.

Authors:  R L West
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Cortical evoked response to acoustic change within a syllable.

Authors:  J M Ostroff; B A Martin; A Boothroyd
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Behavioral and neural measures of auditory temporal acuity in aging humans and mice.

Authors:  Kathy Barsz; James R Ison; Karen B Snell; Joseph P Walton
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  M Van Ingelghem; A van Wieringen; J Wouters; E Vandenbussche; P Onghena; P Ghesquière
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

10.  Sensorineural hearing loss and neural correlates of temporal acuity in the inferior colliculus of the C57BL/6 mouse.

Authors:  Joseph P Walton; Kathy Barsz; Willard W Wilson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-10
View more
  24 in total

1.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Bruna S S Mussoi; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Electrophysiological measurement of binaural beats: effects of primary tone frequency and observer age.

Authors:  John H Grose; Sara K Mamo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Partial maintenance of auditory-based cognitive training benefits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Travis White-Schwoch; Hee Jae Choi; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Biological impact of music and software-based auditory training.

Authors:  Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Overview of Central Auditory Processing Deficits in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samuel R Atcherson; Naveen K Nagaraj; Sarah E W Kennett; Meredith Levisee
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

10.  Exaggerated cortical representation of speech in older listeners: mutual information analysis.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.